To: kellynla
Shouldn't they find out how many people are going back before we go to this expense?
3 posted on
12/16/2005 8:56:50 AM PST by
kerryusama04
(The Bill of Rights is not occupation specific.)
To: kerryusama04
"Shouldn't they find out how many people are going back before we go to this expense?" I'm so embarassed to live here sometimes.
No, No, No... Mary Landrieu just wants them to send the money and stay out of it.
To: kerryusama04
"Shouldn't they find out how many people are going back before we go to this expense?"
NO, we shouldn't be spending another dime on the levees!
We should be moving the friggin' city to higher ground!
and while I'm here, isn't it laughable that Nagin wants folks to move back to N'awlins while he's moved his family to DALLAS!
8 posted on
12/16/2005 9:00:39 AM PST by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: kerryusama04
Two billion for new levees is an urgent expense. Eight billion for fence on Southern border is an unacceptably high expenditure. Am I missing something?
13 posted on
12/16/2005 9:02:19 AM PST by
mikeybaby
(long time lurker)
To: kerryusama04
Shouldn't they find out how many people are going back before we go to this expense?
-----Would we believe how many even if they told us? Some of their citizens/police didn't exist anyway. They were just means of extorting money. I have got so I only believe what the FREepers from down there say because you cannot trust the media or the politicians (they will say more people are coming back in order to get more money). If the FREepers can't tell us, then we will have to wait on an answer. (JMHO)
34 posted on
12/16/2005 2:49:42 PM PST by
WasDougsLamb
(I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson