Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea Already Had 10 Nukes In 1994--Clinton/N.Korea Deal A Big Lie!!
Foreign Affairs Daily ^ | July 31, 1994 | Yossef Bodansky, Senior Editor, GIS

Posted on 12/15/2005 8:29:44 PM PST by SBD1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Mia T

Ping


21 posted on 12/15/2005 9:05:19 PM PST by hattend (Dang, it's cold up here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Bravo Sierra then Bravo Sierra now.
22 posted on 12/15/2005 9:11:53 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

You know, it's pretty easy to look at NK's actions around 1990 and substitute "Iran" today. I can't think of a better argument for destroying Iran's nuclear capability NOW.


23 posted on 12/15/2005 9:15:44 PM PST by Windcatcher (Earth to libs: MARXISM DOESN'T SELL HERE. Try somewhere else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foreverfreedom

bttt


24 posted on 12/16/2005 12:23:23 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (admittedly too unstable for public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

MUST read later


25 posted on 12/16/2005 1:26:50 AM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Of all his talk and B.S. Clinton did nothing to stop NK from developing their first nuclear weapons.


Treason.


26 posted on 12/16/2005 1:31:27 AM PST by H. Paul Pressler IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The book The Real Jimmy Carter details that Clinton was furious with Carter for overstepping his authority, but felt helpless to do anything about it. Which is all baloney, of course.


27 posted on 12/16/2005 4:08:17 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

That means the Beast LIED! She's on record as saying that NK didn't have them when Bubba was getting a Lewinsky!


28 posted on 12/16/2005 4:25:46 AM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

We'll be paying for the damage caused by The Impeached Rapist Disbarred Former POTUS for generations. I wonder if Sandy Burglar was stashing any of this info in his undies.


29 posted on 12/16/2005 6:29:21 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

......When and where did they test the devices?.....

Test? Tests?

We don't need no steenkin tests.


30 posted on 12/16/2005 6:32:38 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . Franks in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian

bttt


31 posted on 01/22/2006 12:34:52 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Let's not forget this info now that the Dem's are trying to blame Bush again. They are trying to claim that they stopped the Plutonium bombs and that the Uranium was a new development under Bush. This report clearly says otherwise.

"Simultaneously, in May 1989, the DPRK and the GDR signed a comprehensive agreement on the transfer of “substantial” amounts of German nuclear technology and nuclear weapons materials, including enriched uranium, to Pyongyang.”

SBD


32 posted on 10/15/2006 2:14:08 PM PDT by SBD1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Liz; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; PhilDragoo; The Spirit Of Allegiance; JLO

Ping


33 posted on 10/15/2006 2:19:58 PM PDT by SBD1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SBD1; devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo
Thanks for the ping


34 posted on 10/15/2006 2:58:45 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Amen........bump.


35 posted on 10/15/2006 4:40:57 PM PDT by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Thanks for the ping!


36 posted on 10/15/2006 9:01:40 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Marine_Uncle

Seen this?


37 posted on 02/07/2007 10:37:00 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Turned it up while searching for this:

N. Korea Seeks Deal for Reactor Freeze

February 06, 2007

N. Korea Seeks Deal for Reactor Freeze

By FOSTER KLUG
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) -

North Korea is proposing to shutter its main nuclear reactor and allow U.N. monitoring in return for massive energy shipments and normal relations with the United States, according to an American nuclear expert who visited Pyongyang last week.

David Albright, a former U.N. nuclear inspector, said in an interview Tuesday that North Korean officials told him they also wanted another key concession for shutting down their Yongbyon reactor: the lifting of U.S. financial restrictions imposed for alleged North Korean counterfeiting of U.S. currency and money laundering. Those restrictions have led to about $24 million in North Korean funds being frozen at a Macau bank.

North Korea, the United States, South Korea, Japan, China and Russia are set to begin a new round of talks Thursday in Beijing aimed at ridding the North of its nuclear weapons program. The push found new urgency after missile and nuclear bomb tests by the communist-led North last year.

Chief North Korean disarmament negotiator Kim Kye Gwan told Albright and Joel Wit, a former State Department official, that nothing would happen until the U.S. agreed to the construction of light-water reactors that Washington promised North Korea under a 1994 deal to freeze Pyongyang's nuclear program.

That deal, which also included an annual supply of half a million tons of heavy fuel oil until the reactors were built, was scrapped in 2002 when North Korea admitted it had restarted its atomic program.

Albright said the North emphasized that it now wanted either electricity shipments or more heavy fuel oil than was promised in the 1994 deal.

Albright said North Korean officials "acted as if it was going to be settled. They were pretty optimistic."

"My sense is that they're willing to go for disarmament, but that it's going to be a very slow process, because of the lack of trust of the United States," said Albright, the head of the Institute for Science and International Security.

Christopher Hill, the chief U.S. envoy to the six-nation negotiations, said Tuesday in Tokyo that negotiators from Pyongyang had not raised the issue of heavy fuel oil in return for shutting down its reactor.

But Hill said there was room to discuss the matter under a September 2005 pledge in which North Korea agreed to give up its nuclear program in exchange for aid and security guarantees.

--

38 posted on 02/07/2007 10:39:20 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

No I hadn't seen this.

Nothing the Clintoons say, is or has been true.


39 posted on 02/07/2007 12:20:23 PM PST by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
North Korea -- the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) -- already has close to 10 operational nuclear warheads for its ballistic missiles, and two nuclear devices that can be carried by truck or transport aircraft. All the weapons are 50kt nuclear warheads, each weighing around 500kg (1,100lb.).

I'm calling BS, if he had one he would have detonated one to show the world how important he is.

40 posted on 02/07/2007 12:22:49 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson