Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child Killer Was a Pothead
Accuracy in Media ^ | December 15, 2005 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 12/14/2005 9:27:54 PM PST by Mojave

The George Soros-funded campaign to legalize marijuana has run into a problem. Joseph Smith, convicted and sentenced to death for the abduction, rape and murder of 11-year-old Carlie Brucia, has been exposed as a pothead. In an unsuccessful ploy to spare his life, his attorneys argued that he was a drug addict, used drugs on the occasion of the Brucia murder, and began his involvement with drugs by smoking marijuana. It looks like marijuana didn't have many "medical benefits" in this case.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: anarchists; badpennyalert; denial; georgesoros; marijuana; nuclearoption; reefermadness; warondrugs; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 461-470 next last
To: Mojave

Hey, everything old is new again. And so it goes.


141 posted on 12/15/2005 7:17:27 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

A parade to the gas chamber, electric chair, firing squad or gallows I will happily join.

If this turd had smoked pot that day he would have never kidnapped and murdered this girl. Perhaps his impulse came because he had STOPPED smoking it.

This article just makes the WoD look even stupider and more desperate being so clearly illogical and flying in the face of facts.


142 posted on 12/15/2005 7:18:02 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I bet he drank a lot of alcohol too. We banning that next?


143 posted on 12/15/2005 7:19:35 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; AmericaUnite

I guess I can assume you guys don't want to be added to the "Potheads for Bush" pinglist?


144 posted on 12/15/2005 7:23:28 AM PST by somniferum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Hey, everything old is new again.

"WAR IS PEACE. FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH."

145 posted on 12/15/2005 7:25:15 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Perhaps his impulse came because he had STOPPED smoking it.

Transcendentally Soros.

146 posted on 12/15/2005 7:26:40 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
All good points.

This guy's already one beyond-twisted sicko for raping and killing Carlie. Fortunately, 12 sane members of society determined that not only did he do it, he's also a menace to society.

Now, $oro$ and his Nutty lawyers on the Left are working overtime trying to excuse his behavior on the grounds that he was stoned into next week when he commited this heinous crime?

Does being drunk excuse a fatal DWI? Absolutely not. It shouldn't matter whether one was drunk or stoned or whatever. He knew what he was getting into when he decided to use those drugs. Just because he lost his presence of mind while he was Nutty on said voluntary usage of drugs is not a reason to excuse the taking of an innocent life.

It's the bleeding-heart liberals exposing themselves for who they are--apologizers and appeasers who'd let a criminal go free because locking him up or putting him to death is "inhumane" and "unfair."

Couple that with the fact that this thing (calling him an animal would be too kind) is a career criminal, and there is no doubt in my mind that he deserves to die.

Thus in the end, I am forced to conclude that: Stupidity never ceases to amaze me...

147 posted on 12/15/2005 7:26:48 AM PST by rzeznikj at stout (Liberalism: The world's singular leading cause of truth decay...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

This isn't a setback for Soros, not even a blip.

It's been proven a million times that most hard drug users started out with pot. It's also known that a high proportion of criminals are drug users. One more murder won't make a bit of difference. People will still joke about Reefer Madness and laugh at you any time you try to tell them that smoking dope is not a Good Thing, and that it often leads to Worse Things.


148 posted on 12/15/2005 7:34:35 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
This isn't a setback for Soros

We'll see.

149 posted on 12/15/2005 7:40:09 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; Mojave; Dr. Eckleburg; SkyPilot; goldstategop; Cincinatus' Wife; ...
Sir Francis, aprôpos of our earlier convo in re The Beatles:

What these Liverpool yobbos did, for which I personally will never forgive them, and those who promoted them, is help convince many members of the formerly sensible working classes that marijuana is a great and good thing to smoke, and sacramental in nature.

A. Nothing is good to smoke. Marijuana, in particular is loaded with tars, oils, and many other compounds. When smoked it creates carcinogenous reactions, just like any other chemical fire. If it is legalized, which I personally oppose, but am willing to submit that as an option to the Democratic process, will it be subject to the same laws as tobacco, with the same research behind it? Can it not be taken as a liquid? As a pill? Why is tobacco smoking anathema to those on the Left, who simultaneously agitate for the legitimizing of marijuana, which smoked, is at least equally harmful. The medical rap is that one joint contains more bad things for the body than a couple of packs of Chesterfields.

B. Since marijuana is (also) an hallucinogen, it is not a good idea to mix it with alcohol, formerly, now, and always, consumed in large quantities and with great gusto by the working classes. I dare say if the young working fellows of my acquaintance were to choose one mild hallucinogen, or the other, they would be far more useful to the general good. However, yobbos being yobbos, they do BOTH. Constantly. As a result their productivity is low, their attendance unreliable, and their wits foggy.

C. Marijuana is a "Gateway" drug. Now, I personally know that many marijuana users, particularly those whose parents inflicted some education upon them, stick happily with it. They cheerfully accept the mental deficits it imposes and use it as their recreation. They are by and large harmless (except that their drug use financially fuels the enemies of America, from Fidel to the Fedayeen). However, they are also usually uniformly boring.

By "Gateway" drug, I mean it predisposes people, including myself (who would not dream of indulging) to the tacit acceptance of illegal activity. (in that regard, it is rather like illegal immigration!) In those of insufficient intelligence, it absolutely does lead to use of other drugs. In my experience, those other drugs, in my region, will be Methamphetamines, and Crack Cocaine. Any sociologist who does not believe me, can drop me a line and I'll take them to 5 County Jails, and they can judge for themselves what has happened to the young men and women of this country.

150 posted on 12/15/2005 7:45:42 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (From now, until 2006, Vote Fraud is my issue. I wish it were the RNC's, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Whatever that is supposed to mean. Do I have to get stoned to understand it?


151 posted on 12/15/2005 7:51:08 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

People don't laugh when told that smoking dope is not a good thing. They laugh at the ridiculous "evidence" used to support that proposition. Such as this article's idiocy that smoking dope turns you into a murderer.

Using this kind of non-logic is the anti-WoSD's best friend.


152 posted on 12/15/2005 7:54:13 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Do I have to get stoned to understand it?

Backwards.

153 posted on 12/15/2005 8:00:37 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Last time I mixed pot and booze I was curled up in the fetal position in front of my puke encrusted toilet afraid to move for fear of being drawn to fits of dry heaving again. Not to say that booze won't cause someone to become apathetic and emotionally disconnected, but the whole pot argument is a favorite of the drug control zealots on Capitol Hill.

Soros is the poster boy for all social ills in this world... and he wants to take away my guns. Once I started collecting firearms, I found that pot could not slake my needs, and the wonder of our second amendment took over as the opiate for my life. Nothing like shooting the 10 ring out of a paper target at 50 yds with iron sights on a Cetme.

154 posted on 12/15/2005 8:01:21 AM PST by rarestia ("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Was he a pork-eater too? We Jews have always known that pork turns otherwise normal people into homocidal maniacs. And I think I have at least as much correlative evidence as you do to suggest that marijuana turned this man into a killer.


155 posted on 12/15/2005 8:05:46 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Great quote from Thomas Jefferson, but totally out of context. The problem is that you don't understand Thomas Jefferson's definition of the term law, its uses and purpose.

For a better understanding, additional quotes from Jefferson:

Laws provide against injury from others; but not from ourselves.

So if Thomas Jefferson was alive today, who would he accuse of despotism?

In a government bottomed on the will of all, the... liberty of every individual citizen becomes interesting to all.

Law is supposed to support liberty, freedom and choice. Law is not supposed to protect us from ourselves. You have done Thomas Jefferson a grave injustice by trying to promote the nanny state using his words.

156 posted on 12/15/2005 8:07:13 AM PST by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55
If Jesus had been getting ripped on Cabernet, stumbling around drooling and losing his mental facility, perhaps your point would be valid.

Funny, just about everyone I've ever met at a "happy hour" goes there to have a drink or two to "unwind" from the days work, not specifically because they like their beer, or gin and tonic, or the glass of wine they're having. It's to alter their state of conciousness, i.e. get a buzz.

When I have "a beer," it's for the taste, and I only have it with a meal (nothing like a good porter or stout with beef, or a Young's Double Chocolate Stout with a chocolat-y dessert!) just as many wine lovers who only drink wine with a meal, feel the same. But don't kid yourself that the vast majority of even social drinkers aren't having a drink to get a buzz.

Mark

157 posted on 12/15/2005 8:09:12 AM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: libertyman
It's [the Constitution] just a g-ddamned piece of paper" --Presidebt Bush, Nov. '05

Just because capitalhillblue posts something doesn't mean it's so... If someone would actually admit being at the meeting, and hearing President Bush make that statement, then I'll believe it... Until then, I'll treat it as nothing more than part of the "Bash Bush" media.

Mark

158 posted on 12/15/2005 8:11:51 AM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I have heard he had a BLT that morning. Must have been the straw than broke the camel's back.


159 posted on 12/15/2005 8:12:11 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
Why is tobacco smoking anathema to those on the Left, who simultaneously agitate for the legitimizing of marijuana, which smoked, is at least equally harmful.

I can't answer for those on the Left. But I don't think either tobacco or marijuana should be illegal.

Since marijuana is (also) an hallucinogen,

Marijuana is a hallucinogen? Really?

By "Gateway" drug, I mean it predisposes people, including myself (who would not dream of indulging) to the tacit acceptance of illegal activity.

What about underage drinking? Failure to use seatbelts? Jaywalking. I'm not sure I see your point. Does jaywalking leed to a culture of law-breaking as well?

160 posted on 12/15/2005 8:12:22 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 461-470 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson