Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ithaca-Area Democrat Wins Election, Judge Tosses Military Ballot
Federal Review ^ | Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Posted on 12/14/2005 9:05:20 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

ITHACA NY—A Republican Town Supervisor has lost re-election by one vote, after a judge ruled on Tuesday that a military ballot not be counted.

According to the Ithaca Journal, the decision by Supreme Court Justice Walter Relihan left incumbent, Gary Fisher of Enfield, one vote shy of his opponent, Democrat Jean Owens.

The military voter was Fisher's son, who was stationed aboard a ship in the U.S. Navy and unable to receive the ballot prior to the election. The ballot was returned to the BOE by the deadline for military ballots, with supporting documentation from a military commander explaining the circumstances. But since the ballot was not received by the voter prior to the election, the judge ruled it should not count.
The military ballot had been challenged by Tompkins County Democrat Party Chair Irene Stein.

Some political commentators have expressed concerns that the Democratic party is actively engaged on a national level in attempting to disenfranchise military voters, who are seen by many as a pro-Republican voting bloc.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: ballots; cityofevil; disenfranchise; ithaca; military; militaryvote; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Brilliant

And isn't it especially disgusting that they attacked the guy's own son? You have to assume he wasn't the only possible absentee ballot to be questioned, but they had to assume that the guy's son voted for him -- they might not have actually be "certain" of that, but it was a likely thing.


21 posted on 12/14/2005 10:01:02 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Outrageous! Judges like him/her should be impeached treason.


22 posted on 12/14/2005 10:01:51 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

It is more that just the condescension that infuriates me, it is the absolute arrogance by some Democrat "heroes" and "patriots" who served our country 30-40 years ago who believe their opinions regarding our soldiers, on war, and foreign policy are more important (or should not be criticized)than mine or your opinions.


23 posted on 12/14/2005 10:06:53 AM PST by guido911 (cowards cut and run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The judge based his ruling on precedent.


24 posted on 12/14/2005 10:09:22 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines


More support for the troops I see. The Dems should be very proud.


25 posted on 12/14/2005 10:12:17 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
>"is there no level to which these Dems won't sink???????? "

Hey here in La. the goverNOT just cancelled the elections till next year. NO kidding, their bus voting machine in NO is broke so they just wont let us have any elections till they get a new one, or get them fixed.

Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

26 posted on 12/14/2005 10:14:23 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (Why waste time learning when ignorance is instantaneous---Hobbes the Tiger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Maybe I'm misreading this, but I assumed he was the only military ballot, or at least the only one that came in after the polls closed. They probably knew that the candidate was a vote short, and then when they got the military ballot, it caused a tie.

But they effectively knew how this sailor voted since they'd already counted all of the other votes, and this was the only one left.

Seems like balloting ought to be confidential, and it was not in this case. This could have been prevented if they'd simply waited until the military ballots were in before counting the votes. Then no one would have been able to tell whether this ballot changed the outcome.


27 posted on 12/14/2005 10:21:31 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Boiling Blood Bump


28 posted on 12/14/2005 10:25:23 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: talleyman
Did you ping Hannity, Rush, etc

How do I do that?

29 posted on 12/14/2005 10:50:33 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

How about a recall? Is that possable?


30 posted on 12/14/2005 5:47:36 PM PST by G-Man 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G-Man 1

No such thing in NY.


31 posted on 12/14/2005 6:35:56 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Russ
What does that moron mean "every vote counts"? The military vote didn't count. But then, again, to these people the military doesn't count for anything...

Yeah, its almost funny. All she did was string together two, basically contradictory, cliches: "every vote counts" and "follow the election law."

32 posted on 12/14/2005 7:59:06 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Well, we have a situation here where the candidate took advantage of the late date for return of military absentees by sending the ballot out after the election had taken place and the results were known.

I would think the elections board, however, would not permit absentees to be distributed after a date a few days before the election anyway. In principle, I can't object to the ruling, although I can't speak to the letter of the law.

It is most interesting, though, that the Democratic party is at a point where it feels there are no negative reprecussions from acting this way.

33 posted on 12/14/2005 8:03:35 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

It's a local election. In Ithaca. A democrat could sodomize and drown a litter of puppies on TV and still not see any "negative reprecussions."

As for disrespecting a military voter, remember that this is the town that lionized four protesters who threw blood on a soldier a few years ago.


34 posted on 12/14/2005 8:12:53 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Just email 'em the post & links
I don't have 'em handy, but just go to their websites, e.g.:

http://www.hannity.com/index/contact-form


35 posted on 12/15/2005 9:56:57 AM PST by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT; governsleastgovernsbest; bentfeather; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; ...
Update: Even the reliably liberal local paper thinks this is wrong:

[the] sailor's honesty that did him in. The younger Fisher took the added step of admitting he voted late when he signed the envelope containing his ballot. It was accompanied by a letter from a commanding officer stating that Fisher was off the ship, on a military mission assigned by his commanders, and could not be given the ballot by Election Day. The ballot got to the Tompkins Board of Elections on time, so if Fisher had said nothing, his vote would likely have been counted....In a nation at war across the globe in a self-styled campaign to promote democracy, having a serviceman lose his franchise because he was on a military mission is simply an unacceptable outcome.

36 posted on 12/20/2005 9:32:53 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Thanks for the post. We should not forget 'rat chicanery in MO, NJ, or Washington State.
37 posted on 12/21/2005 4:39:32 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

bump


38 posted on 12/21/2005 5:41:50 AM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This hard to swallow but s**t happens.
We should not view honesty as being punished.
We should thank God that this young man was so forthcoming.


39 posted on 12/21/2005 5:45:14 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother (MERRRY CHRISTMAS - GOD BLESS US EVERYONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson