[JoeBob]

They don't get any more rational than this.

[DTogo]

About time someone brought this up to the Supreme Court again, since "precedence" is the cherished buzzword these days. Of course, that would have to dovetail with an Administration willing to enforce immigration laws...

[KarlInOhio]

Interesting theory, but rationality has nothing to do with it. You have to word it so that even the irrational 9th Circus court couldn't misinterpret it. The 14th ammendment doesn't pass that test.

[Manfred the Wonder Dawg]

Not to brag, but I've been advocating this for years. Check out my muse here - http://brogdensmuse.menofhonorministry.org/Politics.htm and read the article in the left column titled "Citizen?"

Let's press on for this reasoned view of the 14th Amendment!

[jackbenimble]

Tamar Jacoby finds my interpretation of the Constitution's Citizenship Clause "alarming"

In my opinion, anything that alarms Tamar Jacoby is good. She is the Shill in Chief for the President's Guestworker Shamnesty.

[TheForceOfOne]

Bookmark

[ApplegateRanch]

So there really is hope for this!

That is the clearest, most concise explanation of this issue I've seen yet.

Previously, the arguments posted here that I have read sounded like just wishful thinking coupled with Clintonian word games.

[el_texicano]

Marking for later reference.

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

Direct link to article.