They don't get any more rational than this.
1 posted on
12/12/2005 11:00:19 AM PST by
JoeBob
To: JoeBob
About time someone brought this up to the Supreme Court again, since "precedence" is the cherished buzzword these days. Of course, that would have to dovetail with an Administration willing to enforce immigration laws...
2 posted on
12/12/2005 11:07:05 AM PST by
DTogo
(Merry CHRISTmas, and a healthy & happy New Year!)
To: JoeBob
Interesting theory, but rationality has nothing to do with it. You have to word it so that even the irrational 9th Circus court couldn't misinterpret it. The 14th ammendment doesn't pass that test.
3 posted on
12/12/2005 11:11:41 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(In memory of Alvin Owen, Thsai-Shai Yang, Yen-I Yang and Yee Chen Lin:the victims of Tookie Williams)
To: JoeBob
4 posted on
12/12/2005 11:15:55 AM PST by
Manfred the Wonder Dawg
(In all things give thanks, for this is the will of God for you in Christ Jesus.)
To: JoeBob
Tamar Jacoby finds my interpretation of the Constitution's Citizenship Clause "alarming" In my opinion, anything that alarms Tamar Jacoby is good. She is the Shill in Chief for the President's Guestworker Shamnesty.
To: JoeBob
To: JoeBob
So there really is hope for this!
That is the clearest, most concise explanation of this issue I've seen yet.
Previously, the arguments posted here that I have read sounded like just wishful thinking coupled with Clintonian word games.
7 posted on
12/12/2005 11:42:13 AM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: JoeBob
Marking for later reference.
8 posted on
12/12/2005 12:04:09 PM PST by
el_texicano
(Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
To: JoeBob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson