Posted on 12/11/2005 7:09:15 PM PST by nj26
She's a loser.
Of course not. Not when there are plenty of NY RINOs to do it for her.
This is GOOD news. Another Liberal RINOcrat not running is good for Conservatives everywhere.
John Spencer, your throne awaits!
she never really ran a campaign. the media belittled her from day one because of a missing page in her speech. and conservatives piled on because as always, they want to destroy "RINOs" even if it means Democrats get elected.
Its Hillary in a landslide in this one.
LOL! who? what's he going to get, 30% of the vote?
Pirro did, but the dog-in-manger/ holier than thouers Conservatives and the damned Dem MSM did her in.
If she quits, this will be yet another case of the ultra GOPers getting what they all yearn so for........DEFEAT, when victory was at hand.
So this is how the slime clinton is going to make it to the White House?
Boy, I think us RepubliCANS better do better than this!!!
Couldn't of happened to a nicer example of affirmative action in action. District Attorney Facelift was not ready for prime time.
correct.
too bad Pataki cannot be convinced to run. he could make a race out of it, perhaps winning it.
I didn't care for her arrogance -- as soon as she got into the race, she and her people made it known that they wanted no primary, that she should be anointed the nominee, and that anybody else in the race (like Nixon's son-in-law Cox) should get out of the way. Not to mention her husband making Bill Clinton look like a solid citizen. She was a loser from day one.
I didn't care for her arrogance -- as soon as she got into the race, she and her people made it known that they wanted no primary, that she should be anointed the nominee, and that anybody else in the race (like Nixon's son-in-law Cox) should get out of the way. Not to mention her husband making Bill Clinton look like a solid citizen. She was a loser from day one.
Pirro drops out.
Smartest thing she ever did.
Give it a rest, Chester. Just a little fact check, no Democrat Senator from NY has EVER been defeated since we went to the popular vote 90 years ago.
the bench is real thin (non existent really) here in NY - you have to take what you can get sometimes.
yes, but those senators were actually NYers.
and what gets me is, the "litmus test" crowd chooses NY to make a stand - a state where demographics makes it almost impossible for them to win under ANY circumstances. this is the place where we should "stand and fight" for a real conservative? what for, so we can lose by 40 pts with dignity?
"she never really ran a campaign. the media belittled her from day one because of a missing page in her speech. and conservatives piled on because as always, they want to destroy 'RINOs' even if it means Democrats get elected."
If I can borrow and expression to fit this situation: A RINO is a Democrat, one drink at a time.
In other words, what real difference is there between a Democrat and a liberal Republican senator? Not much.
Conservatives are not simply anti-Democrat. We have to be anti-Progressive, too, regardless of affiliation.
"Its Hillary in a landslide in this one."
Run a real conservative candidate, and New Yorkers will have a chance to narrow that gap. Have some faith.
Including the ones from MA?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.