Since most of this information can be checked, it is presumably true. And it completely contradicts what the FBI says.
It's pretty much what the threads here in FR were saying, but with solid additional evidence.
I think it's time some enterprising reporter asks President Bush why he is letting the FBI repeatedly cover up terrorist attacks. Precisely what is being gained by doing that? Clinton did it because he was partly responsible, and because he didn't want to get involved with dealing with terrorists.
What is Bush's excuse for letting the FBI continue to lie and obfuscate? Why has he done nothing to clean up the mess in the FBI he inherited from clinton?
I looked at it myself. The bogey flew straight up, then tailed the plane, then, thanks be to God, it peeled off. Assuming it was a rocket (really the only logical conclusion) it didn't quite manage to engage well enough to make a hit, then burned out and that's all she wrote.
ROTFLMAO with melancholy.....
Why the down play...could be NOT to give terrorist any publicity at all?