Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creation, Evolution, and Thomas Aquinas
catholiceducation.org ^ | WILLIAM E. CARROLL

Posted on 12/07/2005 5:42:08 AM PST by DarkSavant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Dumb_Ox
To my mind, the use of theoretical models "widely agreed upon by experts" is nominalistic because of the reliance upon "wide agreement" and the acknowledgment that the model doesn't match reality.

That makes sense, but I don't think that this method would serve any useful purpose with regard to creatures, unless there existed a myriad of fossils displaying a continuum of (minute) morphological change, which is clearly not the case.

41 posted on 12/09/2005 8:27:17 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
My answer is that our intelligence has, in effect, removed almost all selective pressure, so it is extremely unlikely that our distant descendants will be radically different from ourselves. Thus the meaning of "God becoming Man" will always be obvious.

I agree with your analysis of Neanderthals. We would have to see a live one to determine whether they are truely human, but it seems to mee that even if we were presented with one, it would be very difficult to judge whether it were fully human. And yes, I mean "human" in the ontological not biological sense.

42 posted on 12/09/2005 5:06:38 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
My answer is that our intelligence has, in effect, removed almost all selective pressure, so it is extremely unlikely that our distant descendants will be radically different from ourselves.

But are these reasonable grounds from the perspective of evolutionary theory? There was a recent pop-science article going around claiming natural selection and evolutionary change was very much still in effect among modern humans.

And don't certain transhumanist fantasies about growing new organs and brain lobes posit quite a few difficulties, even if they aren't ultimately feasible in practice?

43 posted on 12/09/2005 11:09:33 PM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
But are these reasonable grounds from the perspective of evolutionary theory? There was a recent pop-science article going around claiming natural selection and evolutionary change was very much still in effect among modern humans.

There may be some, but the selective pressure is so mild that it's not going to cause any significant changes. For instance, women delaying childbirth may result in later sexual maturity. That people with faster reaction times are less likely to die in car accidents may result in faster reaction times. But beyond that, I really don't see any major selective pressures.

44 posted on 12/10/2005 10:38:48 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I have been reading through Aquinas' account of Creation recently, and he mentions the various opinions of the Church Fathers throughout his arguments. See The Six Days (Matter).

St. Basil the Great, whom Aquinas probably quotes in this section, also preached on the Six Days of Creation in his Hexameron, which I'm skimming through right now:

If there is anything in this system which might appear probable to you, keep your admiration for the source of such perfect order, for the wisdom of God. Grand phenomena do not strike us the less when we have discovered something of their wonderful mechanism. Is it otherwise here?
Source

45 posted on 12/12/2005 6:26:15 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
From your link:
If we were to wish to discover the essence of each of the beings which are offered for our contemplation, or come under our senses, we should be drawn away into long digressions, and the solution of the problem would require more words than I possess, to examine fully the matter. To spend time on such points would not prove to be to the edification of the Church.
Words to the wise.
46 posted on 12/12/2005 7:04:33 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
For instance, women delaying childbirth may result in later sexual maturity. That people with faster reaction times are less likely to die in car accidents may result in faster reaction times. But beyond that, I really don't see any major selective pressures.

What about phenomena like Margaret Sanger's attempts to reduce the births of children of "inferior races," or Hitler's attempt to bring about a "master race"? Is this "selective pressure"?

47 posted on 12/12/2005 7:10:33 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
What about phenomena like Margaret Sanger's attempts to reduce the births of children of "inferior races," or Hitler's attempt to bring about a "master race"? Is this "selective pressure"?

Yes, but thankfully the plans of Hitler and Sanger were foiled.

48 posted on 12/12/2005 4:14:49 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson