Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero
This made me laugh out loud:

The problem is not simply, as Smith thinks, that we cannot posit an adequate hypothetical author. It is that, even if we could, the law that would result would be a hypothetical law (whose violation would presumably be punishable by hypothetical incarceration).

5 posted on 12/06/2005 1:12:58 PM PST by Califelephant (Liberals: "We've always been soft on criminals, but now we're soft on terrorists too.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Califelephant
Yes, indeed. I also liked this counter-example:

Try this hypothetical instead: Two persons who speak only English see sculpted in the desert sand the words “LEAVE HERE OR DIE.”

I suspect that the desert he is talking about although he pretends only to be proposing a "hypothetical," is an allegory for the present state of our legal culture, which is what T. S. Eliot would have called a Waste Land.

9 posted on 12/06/2005 2:25:05 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson