Posted on 12/06/2005 9:07:51 AM PST by Mia T
Geez, I hope you're wrong.
I used to trust the basic good sense of the American people. Even after Clinton was elected, I told myself it was only because of Perot. Even as an incumbent, Clinton could only muster a plurality.
But then, I was totally disillusioned in 2004. I couldn't believe it when 48+ percent of the voters voted for an actual traitor -- a man who was meeting with, and giving aid and comfort to, the enemy, while wearing the uniform of the United States.
There may be no one so low -- even a nasty Marxist dyke -- that she can't get elected in America.
thanx :)
You do all the heavy lifting to put together the message. The rest of us should make sure it gets appropriate attention. We must make sure Hillary and Ickes and the rest of the slimes in her retinue never get near the White House again.
That is the example I consistently use when people tell me that Hillary is unelectable. With a 60,000-vote turnaround in Ohio, a veritable traitor would be in the White House. Yes, she is electable and very, very scary.
I don't know about Hillary being in any sort of a bag, but she's 'a bag' alright!
I have always wondered why she carries such anger with her. (Yes Mia, I think you have seen this before ;-) ).
****
The roots of Hillary's paranoia and anger may just go back to her childhood ................. when her father gave her a toaster and a radio as bath toys.
"Justin Case"???
Cute, eh?
*******
I was going to call myself "ICAB9USA4ALL" ..... but it seemed to Pollyannaish.
"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" by Gail Wynand Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
|
"What can you say about Hillary Clinton that hasn't already been muttered under somebody else's breath?" -- Dennis Miller
LOL. Mia, you are one in a million.
|
With a largely uninformed and disinformed electorate (and I use that term very loosely), the presidential election is basically a crapshoot. This is precisely why we must run someone who, just by standing next to her, makes clinton's smallness and danger obvious to all. |
|
|
:)
thanx :)
"REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED"
Huh?
What is that supposed to mean?
|
|
|
FOREWORD The context is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the underlying issue is whether our democracy will survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and eliminate the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, hillary clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we do about hillary clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. Mia T
|
|
Sean Hannity has just called for the resignation of Howard Dean. |
May I suggest a name for you?
Absolutely!! "Justin Case" you think of another one, let me know. :-)
Ugh!
;-)
I think Hillary wants it that way. It makes her look moderate and thoughtful to have the papier mache heads, drum and dreadlocks crowd booing her.
What you say is true when they are nailing her on ideological grounds.
But my point is that they are nailing her on the character issue.
I find that very interesting.
I do agree with your premise, however.
Howard Dean not only makes the clintons look moderate.
He makes them look sane. (To the casual observer, anyway.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available