LVD: Well, that statement was unexpected.
Then maybe you should listen more, and invent what scientists think from within the confines of your own imagination less.
I think you will have a very hard time proving a majority of scientists think ID is true. Sounds like you may be inventing what you think scientists think from your own imagination. BTW: how do YOU know what scientists think - are you a mind-reader?
No, I'm just a curious sort, likd most scientists, and, like most scientists, try to keep up with current problems that have made the news--chiefly the problem of early advent of life, and several specific large-scale mutational clock anomolies--and, I suppose, a handful of the problems and evidences Fred Hoyle brought up.
One would think these items would be familiar to ID proponents, but I am constantly surprised to see that they are not--until I remember what the actual motivation of a stealth creationist is.
As I pointed out earlier, the actual detailed mechanisms of early life being investigated by actual scientists of the likes of Woese and Wolfram are inherently more interesting to the technically minded. ID or not ID is just an over-sensatonalized, minor bump in that road.