Posted on 12/02/2005 10:33:42 AM PST by wagglebee
Exactly right. Perfect analogy.
You are right that many conservatives, like me, would not vote for Lieberman against the average conservative. But I don't mind disagreeing and arguing with someone amicably on a host of issues as long as we both agree that national defense comes before all other issues. Lieberman understands this. The great majority of Dems do not. That is one reason why I left the party, and have great respect for the few Dems who understand the import of the war on terror. For that reason I would vote for Lieberman before I would vote for someone like Pat Buchanan who does not understand what we are up against. National defense trumps everything else.
Because it is very embarrassing for libs to acknowledge reality. You can't even get them to acknowledge what happened to the Kurds. Logically one would assume that considering what he has done and his failure to reveal all his wmd programs that fair observers would conclude that Hussein was a menace and had to be taken out. I will wager that there is not one Dem or lib who protested Clinton's words and actions in '98 concerning Hussein and his wmds.
The fact is the current president is a Republican. Therefore Hussein can not now be or ever have been a threat, and he never had wmds or did anything bad. It's like the situation in "1984" when history was wiped our or revised to fit the present needs of Big Brother and his minions. End of story.
"Come over to the good side Joe! Defect!"
Even if he does, he will always be balanced out by the likes of Chuck Hagel, Voinovich and McCain.
If it had been the case then President Bush would have been singing it from the Whitehouse roof.
The Iraqi's would have to have been caught red handed with stockpiles of battle field ready weapons. Even some of Saddams Special Republican Guard leaders who have been through the US intel process revealed that none were deployed in their brigades or regiments. SCUDs and their TELs would also have had to found to make a water tight case.
Regardless of what has been found it still does not make a case from the Whitehouse perspective that Saddam had an deployed operational WMD capability. The size of the arsenal that Saddam had there is bound to have been stray rounds. Some of the rounds found were revealed by the US to have been from the Persian Gulf era. What needed to be found was battle-field ready munitions and a trail of captured personnel involved in their operations and deployment.
Yea, but the question is who is being punished in that photo!!!!! Both are pretty bad.
You mean he and Al Gore would have done everything to steal the election not get elected don't you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.