Posted on 11/29/2005 1:19:18 PM PST by hubbubhubbub
"All the perplexities, confusion and distresses in America arise not from defects in the Constitution or confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, as much from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation." [1]
Abstract
Ignorantia juris non excusat (ignorance of the law does not excuse) is a well established principle dating back thousands of years. Roman and English law, precursors of the American system of jurisprudence, both recognized the maxim.
Be it not forgotten – justice excuses not the law. The laws of the land are to be made in pursuance of the Constitution. The Constitution has precedent. Any law not in pursuance of the Constitution is null and void, as if it never occurred. So the court has ruled.
"And there is virgin Justice, the daughter of Zeus, who is honored and reverenced among the gods who dwell on Olympus, and whenever anyone hurts her with lying slander, she sits beside her father, Zeus the son of Cronos, and tells him of men's wicked heart, until the people pay for the mad folly of their princes who, evilly minded, pervert judgement and give sentence crookedly." [2]
No man is above the law – not even the King. No law is above the Constitution – not even the King’s. All men are created equal. All men are judged accordingly. He without sin cast the first stone.
The ignorance of coin, credit, and circulation is unfortunately, a widespread occurrence – causing perplexities, confusion, and distress, all tearing at the social fabric of our nation. But who is guilty of these defects – who has caused them to be?
Is it the fault of the common man that he cannot understand the complexities of a monetary system that moved Lord Keynes to say that not one man in a million understands money?
No, the common man is not at fault, the blame lies elsewhere: it rests with those who have purposefully made the monetary policy so bizarre that even its keepers have a hard time understanding the delusion they have created.
John Kenneth Galbraith clearly understood the illusionary nature of the elite’s monetary economists when he stated that they:
“use complexity to disguise or to evade the truth, rather than to reveal it.” [3]
Fractional Reserves
The most dishonest monetary illusion is the shadow cast by fractional reserve lending.
"Because of 'fractional' reserve system, banks, as a whole, can expand our money supply several times, by making loans and investments." [4]
Let’s take a closer look at the sword of State the magi use to create their tricks of prestidigitation – the scepter of fractional reserves.
What is meant by fractional reserves? It would seem that reserves are reduced to a fraction, but a fraction of what? Perhaps we should seek the wise counsel of the Federal Reserve, as this is their raison d’etre.
Required Reserve Balances
“Required reserve balances are balances that a depository institution must hold with the Federal Reserve to satisfy its reserve requirement. Reserve requirements are imposed on all depository institutions – which include commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, and credit unions – as well as U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks and other domestic banking entities that engage in international transactions.
Since the early 1990s, reserve requirements have been applied only to transaction deposits, which include demand deposits and interest-bearing accounts that offer unlimited checking privileges. An institution’s reserve requirement is a fraction of such deposits; the fraction – the required reserve ratio – is set by the Board of Governors within limits prescribed in the Federal Reserve Act.” [5]
According to the above, the Board of Governors set required reserve balances within limits as prescribed by the Federal Reserve Act that depository institutions must hold on account.
The required reserve ratio is clearly stated to be a fraction of demand deposits and interest-bearing accounts that offer unlimited checking privileges.
Notice the wording “since the early 1990s, reserve requirements have been applied only to transaction deposits”, as such language demonstrates that previous to the early 1990’s reserve requirements were applied to a larger composite – according to the usage of the word “only.”
Which in fact is true, as reserve requirements have been reduced several times since the Fed took control in 1913? A closer look at reserve requirements is in order.
Reserve Requirements
The Federal Reserve has the following to say in regards to reserve requirements:
“Reserve requirements have long been a part of our nation’s banking history. Depository institutions maintain a fraction of certain liabilities in reserve in specified assets. The Federal Reserve can adjust reserve requirements by changing required reserve ratios, the liabilities to which the ratios apply, or both.” [6]
Once again, we see the use of the word “fraction” when discussing reserve requirements, however, we now have the further clarification of reserves in “specified assets.” Obviously, these “specified assets” are critically important, as they are the reserves of our monetary system.
“A depository institution satisfies its reserve requirement by its holdings of vault cash (currency in its vault) and, if vault cash is insufficient to meet the requirement, by the balance maintained directly with a Federal Reserve Bank or indirectly with a pass-through correspondent bank (which in turn hold the balances in its account at the Federal Reserve).” [7]
Now we see that depository institutions satisfy their reserve requirements by holding cash (currency) in their vaults, or if short, they get some help from the Fed or a correspondent bank. The next logical question is: how much cash are they required to have on reserve in their vaults.
From the same Fed publication, we find the following table:
(table didn't come across)
As can be seen from the above chart there isn’t a heck of a lot of reserves on reserve. Three of the five categories listed in the chart have zero (0) reserve requirements. One of the five categories has three (3%) percent reserves, and the remaining category has approximately ten (10%) percent reserve requirements.
So, what are the ramifications of the above listed reserve requirements? From the Fed’s publication, we find the following:
Autonomous Factors
“The supply of balances can vary substantially from day to day because of movements in other items on the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. These so-called autonomous factors are generally outside the Federal Reserve’s direct day-to-day control.
The largest autonomous factor is Federal Reserve notes. When a depository institution needs currency, it places an order with a Federal Reserve Bank. When the Federal Reserve fills the order, it debits the account of the depository institution at the Federal Reserve, and total Federal Reserve balances decline.
The amount of currency demanded tends to grow over time, in part reflecting increases in nominal spending as the economy grows. Consequently, an increasing volume of balances would be extinguished, and the federal funds rate would rise, if the Federal Reserve did not offset the contraction in balances by purchasing securities. Indeed, the expansion of Federal Reserve notes is the primary reason that the Federal Reserve’s holdings of securities grow over time.” [8]
Federal Reserve notes are those little green pieces of paper we all carry around in our wallet or purse and refer to as cash. A dollar bill is a Federal Reserve note, as are fives, tens, twenties, fifties, and one hundred dollar bills.
From where does the Fed get the Federal Reserve Notes? Good question. Let’s try and find the answer.
Notice in the above quote the last sentence, which reads, “Indeed, the expansion of Federal Reserve notes is the primary reason that the Federal Reserve’s holdings of securities grow over time.”
With the Fed’s holding of securities entering the picture, we now have two questions to answer: Federal Reserve notes come from where; and what securities is the Fed holding due to the expansion of Federal Reserve notes?
The Treasury
The Treasury has a role to play in this monetary game of musical chairs. The Fed has this to say regarding the Treasury:
“Another important factor is the balance in the U.S. Treasury’s account at the Federal Reserve. The Treasury draws on this account to make payments by check or direct deposit for all types of federal spending. When these payments clear, the Treasury’s account is reduced and the account of the depository institution for the person or entity that receives the funds is increased. The Treasury is not a depository institution, so a payment by the Treasury to the public (for example, a Social Security payment) raises the volume of Federal Reserve balances available to depository institutions.” [9]
From this we see that the Treasury has an account at the Federal Reserve, and that the Treasury draws on the account to make payments by check and direct deposit. Where did the Treasury’s account at the Fed come from? Rather than finding answers, we are discovering more questions.
Open Market Operations
“Open market operations are the most powerful and often-used tool for controlling the funds rate. These operations, which are arranged nearly every business day, are designed to bring the supply of Federal Reserve balances in line with the demand for those balances at the FOMC’s target rate.” [10]
The more we look, the greater our task becomes. That is good, as often times its not just the answers that matter, but asking the right questions as well. We are getting warmer by the minute.
“In theory, the Federal Reserve could conduct open market operations by purchasing or selling any type of asset. In practice, however, most assets cannot be traded readily enough to accommodate open market operations. For open market operations to work effectively, the Federal Reserve must be able to buy and sell quickly, at its own convenience, in whatever volume may be needed to keep the federal funds rate at the target level. These conditions require that the instrument it buys or sells be traded in a broad, highly active market that can accommodate the transactions without distortions or disruptions to the market itself. The market for U.S. Treasury securities satisfies these conditions.” [11]
United States Treasury securities are the main market the Fed uses to conduct open market operations. As the money supply continually grows, the buying of Treasury securities by the Fed occurs more often then selling.
Summary To Date
Fractional Reserves refers to monetary reserves required to be on deposit in banks. The reserve requirements go from zero, to 3%, to 10%. Federal Reserve notes (cash) are the predominant reserve deposit. When banks need cash, they go to the Fed. The Fed holds U.S. government securities in its accounts. The U.S. Treasury has an account at the Fed. The Fed conducts open market operation of buying or selling Treasury securities. The remaining questions before us are:
Where does the Fed get the ever-increasing supply of Federal Reserve notes? Where did the Treasury account at the Fed come from? Where The Money Comes From
Trillions of dollars are said to be everywhere. I remember as a kid that a million was a big number. Today billions of dollars are tossed around from computer to computer without the blink of an eye. Trillions are now the topic de jour.
Budgets, deficits, and international money flows are all described using trillions or parts thereof. We have come a long way. The financial wizards circle high above the common man. But perhaps the way so chosen is the wrong way, for the good of all of the people – not just the elite few who control the strings of the purse, and profit thereby.
Let’s go within the Temple of the Wizards of Finance, to see what arts the conjuring is done by, to see what potions and spells are cast within fortune’s cauldron, and what strange brew precipitates there from.
The Beginning
On that fateful day when Federal Reserve Notes were first issued, it is obvious that a huge number of dollar bills had to be printed. Now, the printing press is pretty much obsolete; the only money that actually gets printed is used to replace old and worn Federal Reserve notes already in circulation. In vogue today is electronic money – fast food style.
The process actually begins with the Treasury Department printing a piece of paper called a bond, which is done electronically. Treasury bonds are debt obligations (liability) of the government to repay a loan - with interest.
The Treasury sells bonds to the public. The bonds the public does not buy, the Treasury deposits with the Federal Reserve. When the Fed accepts the bond from the Treasury, it lists the bond on its books as an asset.
The Fed assumes the government will make good on its promise to pay back the loan. This is based on the belief that the government’s power to tax the people is sufficient collateral.
Because the Fed now has an asset that it didn't have before receiving the Treasury bond, the Fed can now create a liability that is offset by its new asset.
The liability that the Fed creates is a Federal Reserve check. It gives the Treasury the check in payment for the Treasury bond.
THERE IS NO EXISTING MONEY IN THE FED'S ACCOUNT TO COVER THIS CHECK.
The Federal Reserve check is endorsed by the Treasury and is deposited in one of the government's accounts at the Federal Reserve. The government can use the deposits to write checks against, to pay for government expenses.
This is the first new money flow to enter the system. Various government contractors, vendors, etc. receive these checks as payment for services rendered, and they take the checks and deposit them in their commercial banks.
The Second Step
This is when the wizards of finance perform their greatest feats of magic. The deposits in the commercial banks take on a sort of split personality or dementia, brought on by a preponderance of delusional thinking.
On the one hand, the deposits are the bank’s liabilities, as they owe the total sums to their depositors.
However, because of FRACTIONAL RESERVE lending, the bankers get to lend out 9 times what they have on deposit.
The commercial banks get to list the deposits as RESERVES.
In other words, FRACTIONAL RESERVE lending allows the commercial banks to create 9 times more money then they have on reserve. The banks lend money they don’t have, and:
They get to charge interest on it.
As the newly issued money is put to work by borrowers, they then spend it and the receiver then deposits it in their bank account, and the bank starts the reserve lending policy all over again. This is why the
Money supply must expand by the amount of interest owed on the debt.
If it didn't, the debt would not be able to be serviced. There is no money created without creating debt, they are one and the same. Wealth is not created by creating money by fiat – only debt. As the Fed has admitted:
"Commercial banks create checkbook money whenever they grant a loan, simply by adding new deposit dollars in accounts on their books in exchange for a borrower's IOU." [12]
Conclusion
Fractional reserve lending invokes the moral hazard of fidelity of contract. Banks have on deposit (reserve) at most 10% of the “money supply.”
This means that if more than 10% of depositors go to the bank at one time to withdraw “our” money – there isn’t any money to withdraw beyond the 10% reserves.
Which means that 90% of the money supply is non-existent, nothing more than a fleeting illusion.
The bank’s solvency stands on the faith that no more than 10% of depositors will want their money at the same time. This means that although
Banks may appear to be solvent – they are without question illiquid.
Fractional reserve lending insures and guarantees that banks cannot possibly be liquid.
Banking is the only type of business that is allowed to function this way. If any other business used a similar modus operandi it would be subject to censor, arrest, court, and possibly imprisonment. Banks cannot fulfill all of their contracts if demand occurred at the same time. Thus, the banks are illiquid.
Why the double standard? Why the dishonesty? Why are they afraid of gold and silver money as the Constitution mandates? Because it would make them tow the line or go bankrupt. Less they forget - be ever mindful - even Zeus cannot deny Destiny.
Coming Soon – Open Letter To Congress Seeking Redress For The Return To Honest Money
[1] John Adams in a letter to Thomas Jefferson [2] Hesiod, Works and Days [3] John Kenneth Galbraith Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went [4] Federal Reserve Bank, New York The Story of Banks, p.5. [5] The Federal Reserve System Purposes and Functions The Implementation of Monetary Policy [6] Same as above [7] Same [8] Same [9] Same [10] Same [11] Same [12] Federal reserve Bank of New York, I Bet You Thought, p.19
Name ONE nation which went to unlimited unbacked fiat money and unlimited credit and debt, where the system did not implode into disastrous ruin.
Are you saying the United States has unlimited fiat money? Does the United States have unlimited credit and unlimited debt?
ping
That's RIGHT.
The Fed is a contrivance created through the efforts of the Int'l Rothschild banking cartel.
Indeed the inflation the Fed's creation has allowed was the imperative of it's creators so that Govt could finance with inflated dollars WWI, WWII and all others since along with all the unconstituional entitlement and pork spending by Govt that DOES NOT benefit every single citizen equally.
That's what the "General" in "promote the general welfare" was all about. That if govt spent the people's money, it could do so only if ALL citizens were equally benefitted.
In a nut shell: the Fed was created by the elites for the elites and we the (ignorant) people are left holding the bag to the tune of approx $20K per man women and child in Fedl debt.
It gave our Govt a power over the people's purse that the Founder's NEVER intended and sought to prevent in the Constitution.
One of the biggest reasons for the Great Depression was the the Euros got off the gold standard to inflate for their own spending during and after WWI. When England wanted to get back on, Churchill insisted the pound be valued at it's pre-war gold standard value, which of course it no longer was due to it's inflation. But we allowed it, our bankers being more loyal to the Int'l Banking Cartel than to America, and the apple cart toppled. Do you remeber FDR confiscating the all people's bullion? Then his arbitray revaluation of the price of gold?
WE, dear friends, are a country of sad ignorant dupes.
Isn't it about time we reverted to our pre-1900's Constitution whose sole purpose was the protection of citizen's rights and property???
Ah NO!
By ALL RIGHTS a currency backed by precious metals should have been appreciating ALL these years, as the Founders provided for, instead of the pennies on the dollar it's worth now.
Our Founder's were genius's, they knew all about the Romans insisting in pure gold or silver coins when collecting taxes, (the coins have the file marks to prove it), but the Roman Republic had no problem issuing new coins that were silver coated copper - much like our copper plated aluminum.
No one should be without a fraction of their porfolio's being in gold.
The Fed and the New Dealers are all part and parcel of the same scam by banking, political and industrial elites, and we the people are reduced to worker bees, in the "Queens" service.
This has already been answered: United States, England, France. The only time your scenario has been seen are during times of revolution, war or in nations undergoing some political realignment or which do not have a tradition of responsible government.
Name ONE nation which, without numerous devaluations, stayed on the Gold standard for more than a couple of decades at a time.
"Fiat" money does not exist and never has. Value is based on FAITH not government command. If the people believe the currency to be worthless it will be no matter how many times the government says "let it be." If they believe it strong it will be.
And it is convertible. If you want gold or silver you can convert your dollars into them just by BUYING them. Their values declined against the dollar for almost two decades. In other words the dollar became MORE valuable than gold.
Can you not see the inherent insanity in having your money supply held prey to demand for gold in India, jewelry tastes or arbitrary actions of the South Africa government over gold production or strikes of gold miners in Russia?
The only "collateral" are we taxpayers left holding sacks full of IOU's.
My guess is that the largest horde of the world's bullion lies in the vaults of those who conspired to create the Fed.
I trust von Mises & Hayek!
The rest of the charlatans be damned
Well... I can't think of a case where any nation has ever had a truly unlimited money supply. So I guess you got me there.
But I can think of lots of nations that rode the gold standard all the way into a Great Depression.
There's nothing magic about gold. There's just as much "faith" implicit in it as there is in any symbolic currency. There is no inherent value in gold, there is merely faith that it will someday be convertible to some good or service, just like with the dollar, or the pound.
All currency is merely a symbolic substitute for some future transaction. This is true of gold, silver, paper, copper... all of it. The only alternative that truly is independent of any "fiat" or "faith" is the barter system. But bartering for everything is wildly impractical, so we invented currency.
The supply of money must be able to vary with the total production of the economy. It's not a fixed pie. As total productivity grows or shrinks, the supply of money needs to grow or shrink with it or prices become unstable. Price instability is bad and is the worst of the economy killers.
Since you admire the Founders perhaps you will note that they did NOT forbid federal issuance of paper money.
As to the rest of your paranoid raving - whatever. You cannot deny that the economic success of the US is unparalleled. Most of it coming after gold was relegated to the jewelry shops.
Worker bees my a$$. Sounds like you took more than a bite out of Marx's beliefs.
You sign only what you are willing to agree with, no?
Gold is not an investment, and it does not appreciate in value. By definition, gold is a ~store~ of value.
It flucuates in ~price~, not value. Two different things.
By contrast, the fluctuation in price of a stock is in fact a change in value. The earning power or productivity of a company goes up or down, so the value of a share of stock goes up or down with it.
The Trilateral Commission? The Bildebergers? The Stonecutters?
You want an appreciating currency? Isn't that deflation? Don't you think deflation is a bad thing?
Well there it is, folks.
Please bookmark this thread, and let's revisit in one year.
I agree.
Runaway!!!
Fair enough.
But what do you call the current $20K+ Fedl debt per person? Was it NOT the Fed that has allowed the people's purse to become the slush fund of politicians in their buying of votes with OPM, or to finance any boondoggle that enriched crony industrialists? Making possible our entries into the two world wars both Wilson & FDR said we would not enter?
Wilson was the banker's pawn. Bankers that supported BOTH sides of BOTH wars, as well as the Rockefeller's who had large stakes in IG Farben-industrie and the German Dye Trust. And who stood to gain because the Kaiser was building a railroad between Berlin and Bahgdad! We were sucked into WWI when Britain agreed to end Std Oil's barriers to near middle eastern oil in the "War to save Democracy"
Post WWI, Std Oil had in hand oil concessions from Roumania, Bulgaria, Ethiopia, Sumatra, Turkey, Persia and Saudi Arabia.
Britain had seized the Baku oil fields from the Turks & Germany who had seized them. In 1920 Std Oil of NJ purchased the Baku oil holdings of Nobel Oil Co. For eight years Std Oil battled Royal Dutch Shell for it's Baku holdings. This was achieved by their offer to recognize the Soviet Govt by the US and to support communism in the US in return for oil. As soon as FDR took office, the US recognized the Soviet Govt. In 1935 Socony Vacuum announced it had been heavily buying oil from Russia since 1927!
Not a few historians have claimed that w/o WWI, WWII would never have happened.
Our financial & industrial elites profited handsomely from both wars.
America's profound success is due solely to the fact that we Americans have the largest amount of capital invested per capita. That being ALL capital; IE education, factories, tools & equipment and it's improvement of productivity over all others, all of which was only possible due to the comparatively lower taxation of Americans vs it's competitors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.