Gads! I cannot believe Murtha is bringing up 'no body armor, didn't have enough ____ (fill in the blank), fire Rummy, Wolfowitz is bad, AG, misled by evidence, didn't find WMD, yada, yada, yada. The Dims haven't used some of these lines in a while, but, here they go again, recycling the same old lines.
New one - he predicts we'll be out of Iraq by election day 2006.
'Morning. Is it true that Murtha only served one year in Vietnam and the rest of his 35(?) years have been in the reserves?
Murtha is stating the obvious. We could very well have fewer troops in Iraq by election time. It's planned anyway, IMHO.
What is particularly telling by his Statements is that he is using talking points from two years ago or more by the Dems. He is talking about Wolfowitz who is running the World Bank now. the Dems are trying to make him out to be the big Hawk on the War when it is obvious he has been anti-war for a long time, and he did not just wake up and have a "come to Jesus" moment. Almost everything he has said recently has already been hashed and rehashed and it seems like he was asleep when all this was done in the last 2 1/2 years by the anti American cut and run Democrats.
That's the feeling you get listening to the 'panel' on 'This Week'
George Will said we had an 'Imperial' foreign-policy... he's the perfect example of a checkered-pants Republican... pure fodder for the left to graze on.
I know! They've raved on about this for literally YEARS and it didn't win them much, yet they can't let go of it.
Hussein was preventing the UN from inspections. How would we even know there was no WMD unless we went in there like we did?