Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cardinal4
The new dem talking point is that "Clinton didnt go to war, even though he recognized the threat".

Which gave us, ultimately, 9/11 (not, as Charlie Rangel keeps calling it, 911), which changed everything.

570 posted on 11/20/2005 10:16:29 AM PST by Bahbah (Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]


To: Bahbah
Which gave us, ultimately, 9/11 (not, as Charlie Rangel keeps calling it, 911), which changed everything.

It amazes me that the left just doesnt grasp how much the world changed on that day. Regardless of whether Hussein had anything to do with 9/11, he was doomed the second that first plane hit the tower. Why? Because a regime like his just eminates evil, and is a beacon for all of those who oppose democracy and liberty. A magnet for terror and after 9/11, regimes like his cannot just be "contained", which until then was the liberal policy. "He is only gassing his own people, so we will huff and puff and bomb sporadically, and that will contain his evil" was the Clinton mantra. Containment as a policy went out of the window at 0847 on the morning of 11 September, 2001. We hate it for the loss of life and the gross affront to liberty and freedom, the Dems and libs hate it because it exposed their lassez-faire attitude toward monsters like Hussein and Bin-Ladin, and because they now have to justify their appeasement..

577 posted on 11/20/2005 10:25:37 AM PST by cardinal4 ("One man gone and another to go....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson