Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2005 9:37:21 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest

The only saving grace was that audio problems cut the interview short before Dole was able to heap yet more praise on big government expansion.


2 posted on 11/15/2005 9:38:22 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

The Republicans don't need any help from the Democrats.


3 posted on 11/15/2005 9:39:45 AM PST by Protagoras (To keep freedom, you must give it away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Great. Now ol Bob can have us buy his Viagra for him....


4 posted on 11/15/2005 9:40:28 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It's BAD for everyone....prices for drugs will grow exponentially with government interference....sheesh...some of the "greatest generation" seems to have Alzheimers..


6 posted on 11/15/2005 9:41:10 AM PST by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Given his years of flacking for Viagra, and now his high-profile support for the prescription drug benefit, seems that Dole has become a real stand-up guy when it comes to promoting pharmaceuticals.


7 posted on 11/15/2005 9:42:15 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Brady Bill Bob is a prescription drug socialist to boot? Why am I not surprised.


8 posted on 11/15/2005 9:42:19 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Dole. Yet another big-gooberment RINO.

God, save us from these azzholes.


10 posted on 11/15/2005 9:43:44 AM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Have any of your actually read any of those programs? My husband tried reading some of the literature my mother-in-law has been sent. Yikes...it is massive and really hard to follow. No wonder the deadline is April...you need that much time to figure it out.


11 posted on 11/15/2005 9:43:47 AM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Stay mad PA, stay mad!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

About the only hopeful thing I can say about the GOP is that there's no Bob Dole Jr.


12 posted on 11/15/2005 9:44:20 AM PST by AlexandriaDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Still, at this stage of his career, it's sad to see Dole flacking for big government.

He's always been that way.

14 posted on 11/15/2005 9:46:02 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Great program???

All that viagra must have stiffened his brain.

Have any of you looked into it for a parent? The most confused bunch of mess I have ever seen. There is no way the majority of oldsters are going to make heads or tails of it.
Even the terms they use need special definition because they don't mean what you think they mean.

AND...If you have a plan and medicare says their plan is better than yours, but you don't take this "benefit", you will be penalized 1%per month for every month it took you to come to your senses and get with the program.

This is a swamp with no bottom.


17 posted on 11/15/2005 9:49:19 AM PST by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Geez, what a bunch of negative talk on this thread!

Unlike those Democrat morons, the Republican Party can make socialism work!

Besides, it's not socialism if we don't call it that.

/pubbybot program


19 posted on 11/15/2005 9:52:21 AM PST by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I bristle mightily at that commercial about this drug program where an senior woman says she's so grateful for the program because now she has more money to buy gifts for her grandchildren.

So thanks to this drug program, you and I are, in essence, buying this woman's grandchildren toys! Sheesh!

20 posted on 11/15/2005 9:53:34 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This program will kill the country. Medicare is too, too, too much money.

I am disappointed in Senator Dole.


21 posted on 11/15/2005 9:54:03 AM PST by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The misinformation about this program is disgusting.

This morning WABC radio played a shrill woman bitterly complaining about being FORCED into this program. She went on to say there are no words to describe how angry she is.

No one is FORCED to participate.

I am on Medicare. I did not sign up nor do I intend to sign up. I have no prescription plan from any source.

Low income people will benefit, and most of the chain pharmacies have people on staff to help you decide which plan is best.

If the greedy geezers can get themselves down to their condos in Florida they can take the time to get informed.

23 posted on 11/15/2005 9:55:19 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

If the democrats don't like it and true conservatives don't like it, why don't we scrap it and make everyone happy?


28 posted on 11/15/2005 10:01:00 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
As I am 66 and have received SS for nearly two years.
Even though I paid in the maximum for most of my 40 years of working I still consider it a welfare program.
One of the things that bug me is the government must give mailing lists of people on SS.
I receive junk mail from every insurance company now it is drug insurance now.
They must make a lot of money by their continuous ads on TV and their junk mailings.
31 posted on 11/15/2005 10:10:59 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (expert, break it down, ex = has been, spurt = drip under pressure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Because this new entitlement was a republican initiative is reason enough to never again support any of the elected officials responsible for it's existence.
32 posted on 11/15/2005 10:12:30 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Still, at this stage of his career, it's sad to see Dole flacking for big government."

"At this stage of his career, it's sad to see Dole still flacking for big government."
There.
Fixed.

33 posted on 11/15/2005 10:18:25 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

We were told in 1996 by the party establishment that it was Bob Dole's "turn" to be the presidential nominee. He got the nomination, though he was a weak candidate who stood little chance against Clinton. (I believe that it was Newt Gingrich who had earlier called Dole the "bagman" for the welfare state, during Newt's backbench bombthrowing days.)

In 2000 the party establishment wanted early on to push aside many of the GOP candidates so as to coronate George Bush, who barely eked out a narrow win over AlGore, and then opened the border gates even wider than Clinton and presided over more domestic spending than LBJ.

If the party insiders tell us who we must get behind in 2008, I recommend we put our hands over our billfolds and back out of the room carefully.


38 posted on 11/15/2005 10:29:38 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson