[Sun]

It does seem that so many of the evos are atheists or agnostics. Not all, though.

I used to think that it was possible that God might have used evolution, but the more I read about the evolution theory, with all it's holes, I came to the conclusion that it is bunk.

However, I have respect for sincere folks who believe in God, as well as evolution, but they are wrong.

There is a difference between scientific proof and scientific theory.

[RunningWolf]

That is somewhat or pretty much the route I followed too, and not without much reading and observation.

One part, go to the big museums and take a look at some of the work, and see the great reaches from 'the evidence'.

There is evidence alright, of much greater things than evolution.

Wolf

[Dimensio]

I used to think that it was possible that God might have used evolution, but the more I read about the evolution theory, with all it's holes

Could you clarify by what you mean by "holes"? Or perhaps refer to a previous post where you enumerated a few?

There is a difference between scientific proof and scientific theory.

There is no "proof" in science. No explanation ever rises higher than the level of "theory". All explanations are potentially falsifiable, or they are not scientific.

[elbucko]

It does seem that so many of the evos are atheists or agnostics. Not all, though.

I have no desire or compulsion to evangelize, agnosticise or atheize others.

However, I have respect for sincere folks who believe in God, as well as evolution, but they are wrong.

Well then, by your reckoning, I am wrong.

There is a difference between scientific proof and scientific theory.

This is true, but none of them demand to get into a church or the Bible.