Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Internet Control Annoys Nations
The Tampa Tribune ^ | 11/11/05 | MATT MOORE

Posted on 11/11/2005 2:06:43 PM PST by DogBarkTree

FRANKFURT, GERMANY - -- On the global Internet these days, the United States is less trusted and more alone. The worldwide network was born on U.S. shores, but that matters little to the growing number of nations now demanding shared control.

An escalating feud over Internet governance is threatening to transform a U.N. summit in Tunisia next week into an acrimonious showdown between the United States and challengers including the European Union.

The debate is over whether Washington, through its oversight of a quasi-independent agency, should continue as the ultimate administrator of all the Web's domains -- not only over ".com" but also the country-specific ones such as ".cn" for China.

At its essence, the struggle is over an information superstructure that is already the main conduit of world commerce. It is also about free speech and information control. The arbiters of Internet policy could profoundly shape international relations in coming years.

"I am torn about this, as I suspect many Internet law experts are. On the one hand, basic principles of international law suggest that a common carrier essential to commerce in all nations should be internationally controlled," said Frank Pasquale, a professor at Seton Hall Law School in Newark, N.J.

"On the other hand," Pasquale added, "many of the countries most eager to impose international control also have bad records on free speech issues, political prisoners."

The so-called World Summit on the Information Society was originally conceived to address the digital divide -- the gap between information haves and have-nots -- by raising both consciousness and funds for projects.

Instead, it has centered largely on Internet governance: oversight of the main computers that control traffic on the Internet by acting as its master directories so Web browsers and e-mail programs can find other computers.

Although the U.S. government has largely delegated management to a private organization with international board members, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, it has ultimate veto power over all decisions.

Washington set a course for confrontation when it declared over the summer that it will retain such oversight indefinitely, despite what many countries thought was a long-standing policy to one day completely turn the function over to ICANN.

The EU responded in September by insisting that some sort of new combination of governments and the private sector share the responsibility of policing the Internet. Before, the push for an international takeover of ICANN mostly came from such developing countries as Brazil, South Africa and China.

"Unilateral control by the U.S. government would be very sad," EU spokesman Martin Selmayr said. "They just have to give up their unilateral control and everything will be fine."

The reasons for resentment of U.S. control are numerous, beginning with objections to U.S. foreign policy.

On actual Internet-related issues, there's frustration that the countries that got online first -- the United States and western Europe, chiefly -- gobbled up most of the available addresses required for computers to connect, leaving developing nations with a limited supply to share.

There are also complaints that governments can't easily control their own domains -- changing administrators for country-code domains can take years.

Countries such as Pakistan, India and China and several in Africa -- where many potential users know little, if any, English -- want quicker approval for domain name suffixes in their languages, something on which ICANN is moving like molasses.

Nonetheless, much of the criticism of U.S. control is philosophical: If governments already handle public services such as delivering food and water, why should they cede something as important as the Internet to another country?

What critics seek varies and remains in many cases vague.

Some want an international body that would address issues ICANN doesn't currently oversee, plagues like spam and security. Others want ICANN or a replacement technical organization to answer not to the Commerce Department but to an international organ, possibly under the United Nations.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: icann; internet; worldopinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Annoyed? Boo &%$*ing Hoo. As "The Great One" Mark Levin would say, "when they are annoyed, I'm happy"
1 posted on 11/11/2005 2:06:44 PM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
"I like that. Give me it."

FN Germans.

2 posted on 11/11/2005 2:08:06 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Tough toenails...


3 posted on 11/11/2005 2:08:07 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

We built this one. They are free to build their own.


4 posted on 11/11/2005 2:08:23 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be. -El Neil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

UM Stupidity annoys the intelligent life on the planet

Global Dumbing being studied by science..


5 posted on 11/11/2005 2:09:23 PM PST by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Na-na-na-na-na-na
We control the net
Na-na-na-na-na-na
We control the net
Na-na-na-na-na-na
We control the net


6 posted on 11/11/2005 2:10:59 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights (GOP, The Other France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
The worldwide network was born on U.S. shores, but that matters little to the growing number of nations now demanding shared control.

The rest of the world are children and must be treated as such
7 posted on 11/11/2005 2:11:22 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree; All
The UN annoys me something terrible...

Click this picture & go to the "last" for the latest UN scandals:


If you aren't informed about this stuff, you will be made sick. If you are informed, you will be made mad, all over again.

8 posted on 11/11/2005 2:11:39 PM PST by backhoe (The Silence of the Tom's ( Tired Old Media... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Gee...that's too bad.


9 posted on 11/11/2005 2:11:39 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Thank God the internet was created after Carter was president. He'd have given it away along with the Panama Canal!


10 posted on 11/11/2005 2:12:23 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Yep, go build your own if you don't like ours.


11 posted on 11/11/2005 2:12:38 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Oh No! Oh No! We must appease them now!!!


12 posted on 11/11/2005 2:13:23 PM PST by HHKrepublican_2 (you cant spell liberal without an L an I and an E...If the first amendment doesn't work, use the 2nd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Oh goody!

They hate us and want our stuff!

13 posted on 11/11/2005 2:15:48 PM PST by Jagdgewehr (Red County - Notoriously Blue State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

I'm sure the usual lefty groups here in the US would like to see this happen.


14 posted on 11/11/2005 2:16:31 PM PST by NewMediaFan (Fake but accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2


GEEZ! When I posted about this it was "Oh, this is no big deal."

(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1505680/posts)

Now you guys think it's a problem?


15 posted on 11/11/2005 2:19:10 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

The UN is only good at corruption, rape and Anti-Semitism. Only Leftist scum would want them to control the 'Net. Thank God that neither AlGore or the, ahem, war hero were elected.


16 posted on 11/11/2005 2:19:28 PM PST by Sociopathocracy (The Left and Islamo-fascism, the twin cancers of human history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

I have seen many of these type articles coming out lately. Even about half of those very liberals on /. think US control is the way to go.

But, one point that has not even been considered in this is taxation. If, somehow, the UN becomes controller of DNS, doesn't anyone think that not only will organizations, companies, and even countries be subjected to their governance (read censorship) but also their taxes?

UN: "I'm sorry FR.com (or even /.) you failed to meet our censorship guidelines and your overdue on your internet taxes..."


17 posted on 11/11/2005 2:20:10 PM PST by xmm0 (This post has been brought to you by the letters "U," "S," and "A" and Amendment number 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
"Unilateral control by the U.S. government would be very sad," EU spokesman Martin Selmayr said. "They just have to give up their unilateral control and everything will be fine."

Gee, that's tough Marty. Now you and Tom Daschle can hang out and be sad together. We don't have to give up anything. Why don't you come and take it from us?

We developed the technology and we invested in and established the infrastructure. Invent your own damn Internet.

18 posted on 11/11/2005 2:20:55 PM PST by One_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
Let the Turd World build their own steam-powered Internet.

Screw 'em. Next!

19 posted on 11/11/2005 2:21:12 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

As "The Great One" Mark Levin would say, "when they are annoyed, I'm happy"
_________________________________________

Love it.

Old Euros and the rest of the losers should invent a new way of sharing data...how about around a campfire or transcendental meditation with the dalai lama assisted by Richard "gerbil" Gere. Nations that support values of freedom should get priority when we decide to share the technology.


20 posted on 11/11/2005 2:21:22 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson