Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jjmcgo
Delivering information on the Internet is very efficient and economical, and Santorum's bill wouldn't save taxpayers one penny. It is strictly designed to benefit a few companies like Accuweather in Pennsylvania, to the detriment of everyone else in the other 49 states.

If Santorum had any presidential aspirations, he can forget about winning votes in the South. His reputation is ruined here because of this legislation - which is doomed to fail.

101 posted on 11/11/2005 4:22:49 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000

You show a lack of familiarity with the variety of ways NWS releases its information publicly.
And, even in the case of the Internet, it still requires inputters all around the country.
Where is the need for duplicate sources of free information, all carrying the same government-generated information?
Last, this is a big issue to you. I've never met anyone else in this state, where I live, concerned about it.
But you have a right to your vote, on whatever basis you make it.
Santorum is a conservative Republican, a Catholic like me, pro-life, pro-military and pro-Pennsylvania. I'll be voting for him.


103 posted on 11/11/2005 8:02:21 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson