Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey 54%, Santorun 34% (Rasmussen Reports) - Ouch!!!
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 11-10-05 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 11/10/2005 12:35:37 PM PST by TitansAFC

The latest Rasmussen Reports survey shows that Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum is continuing to lose ground in his battle for re-election. Santorum trails Democrat Bob Casey, Jr by twenty percentage points, 54% to 34%.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; bobcasey; casey; caseyschumer; dadscoattails; demhackcasey; election; juniorcasey; santorum; schumercasey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-393 next last
To: montag813
Santorum gets whatever he deserves for betraying Pat Toomey. Notice how he, Bush and Rove have all been cursed politically for that act of betrayal of conservatism

You have got to be kidding me

341 posted on 11/10/2005 7:38:09 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
They put in a non-severability clause and they lowered the court's salary as well. That is unconstitutional (can't have the legislature changing the court's salary mid-term), so the entire pay raise repeal should get tossed out.

DUH! I knew they were hedging their bets the minute I heard they put the clause in... Repubs are still trying to keep their ill gotten gains... like I said.. come May, the incumbent R from my district WILL NOT GET MY VOTE, period.

This fake repeal, with the fix being in, is just another insult to the intelligence of the people of PA.

342 posted on 11/10/2005 8:31:33 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: capydick
He got a good return on that Arlen investment, didnt he?

My sentiment exactly! One would have to think that has something to do with it. This would appear to me to be a "thanks but no thanks" boomerang shot. I can certainly see why conservatives aren't all googly-eyed about voting for him.

343 posted on 11/10/2005 8:36:03 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I support Santorum.

Ah, I figured that, really. You're ususally on the right side of every issue.
344 posted on 11/10/2005 9:46:53 PM PST by Antoninus (Hillary smiles whenever a Freeper trashes Rick Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I'll tell you what, if it had happened to me, I would have done something like that. my sister miscarried a baby boy at age 12 weeks. he was about the length of the palm of her hand, and she told me she held him for a long time, looking at him, touching his little mouth, etc. The doctor wanted her to bring him in, but she refused. She and her husband found a little box for him and had their own little funeral and buried him. She says she wished she had a picture of him.

Another friend of mine did the same with her 8-wk-old baby that she miscarried, but she had the priest come and baptize her, and they named her Mary.

345 posted on 11/10/2005 10:18:32 PM PST by GOP_Thug_Mom (libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Pennsylvania is a socially conservative state, both Democrats and Republicans, despite the MontCo libs.

Depends on what part of the state you're in really...the banjo part is really actually small on a per capita basis. I say this with all due respect to my Deering Sierra. IMHO, PA is pretty middle of the road and Santorum is way way to the right of where people are comfortable.

346 posted on 11/11/2005 3:18:52 AM PST by mancogasuki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
True. It's the Democrats that have only one issue (pro-abortion).

omfg, please tell me you're not in charge of the 2006 agenda or we're fackt.

347 posted on 11/11/2005 3:29:45 AM PST by mancogasuki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat
One would have to think that has something to do with it.

It's got to have had some effect on his base. I wonder if Arlen will return the favor and campaign with him in the areas where Sphincter is a favorite.

348 posted on 11/11/2005 6:10:09 AM PST by capydick (or)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: mancogasuki

Welcome to FR. You have a lot to learn about sarcastic hyperbole.


349 posted on 11/11/2005 9:06:44 AM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Yep. Rather than rehash the point (which is that the author is attempting to redefine conservatism to paper over its failure to deliver the goods as promised), I refer you to the Reason review.
350 posted on 11/12/2005 3:00:39 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

We will be voting for Santorun and I am sure that others in this area will be doing the same, not all of PA is Blue.


351 posted on 11/12/2005 3:02:41 PM PST by Dustbunny (Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Santorum is the real deal for Conservatives. The PA GOP and the rest of us had better make a stand in PA.


352 posted on 11/12/2005 3:03:10 PM PST by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Forget the "housing bubble". We are watching the Bush Bubble bursting right before our eyes.

You may be right....

353 posted on 11/12/2005 3:03:57 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

It's too late for Santorum. If he can't put it together now, then he can't put it together.


354 posted on 11/12/2005 3:59:50 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Why do Pennsylvanians hate Santorum?


355 posted on 11/12/2005 4:09:20 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want yo"ur opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

You're mistaken.

It's Santorum who is still being treated as a saint even though his RECENT record does not bear that out.

He has proposed and supported a lot of lousy legislation with the likes of Clinton, Kennedy, and Schumer. He has advocated raising the minimum wage, increasing SS taxes, and doling out $500 in taxpayer dollars to each new born child.

He voted against increasing security at the border and against cutting pork barrel spending to make it easier to pay for the damage done by Katrina and Rita.

He is not the man that we were all led to believe that he was. He is merely interested in keeping his job and will use any issue and any constituency to do it.

NO! We don't want Casey. We would prefer that he get a cushy job somewhere else and let an honest man run in his place and preferably someone who really is a conservative and not one who just played the part to win.


356 posted on 11/13/2005 10:25:53 AM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

See #356


357 posted on 11/13/2005 10:33:00 AM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: winner3000

Tell me what he has done that resembled anything like conservatism in the past 18 months. Mind you, I don't want any bit parts that he played for the TV cameras, but real actions that have advanced conservative values.

What legislation has he proposed or supported?

What votes has he cast?

What causes has he championed?

When and where did he risk his political future to fight for what was right?


358 posted on 11/13/2005 10:42:46 AM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Reagan79
It might have something to do with supporting Specter over Toomey.

I forgot about that. Why do they do things like that when the people want someone besides an incumbent? I would probably not support him either since he helped give us Arlen Specter (how much did that help Republicans?!).

359 posted on 11/13/2005 10:46:30 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Do you have any evidence that he'd respect the Constitution any more sitting on the SCOTUS than he does now sitting in the Senate?



360 posted on 11/13/2005 10:49:20 AM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson