"You left out any answer to the part that asked: "should individuals be insulated against liability for the debts they incur in doing business?" Should they?"
That's not part of antitrust, which is what we were discussing.
Of course, antitrust is not about whether ID is science either. Why don't we just accept we don't fully agree on economics and stick to exposing the weaknesses of creationism and ID? :) I forget already how we got to antitrust to begin with. I should have stayed on the topic of the thread instead of letting myself get taken along on a tangent.
Regards.
Actually, with the direction this thread was taking, the anti-trust discussion was a whole lot more interesting.
I guess we'll have to agree that we don't fully agree on anti-trust or the proper role of government in business regulation (the latter being, as I'm sure you are aware, the point of my question).
I'm sure you will agree with me, though, when I say it's kind of nice to converse for a while without being called a hellbound spawn of evilutionist materialism. : )