Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Weyco worker's suit says she was harassed
Lansing (MI) State Journal ^ | November 4, 2005 | Barbara Wieland

Posted on 11/09/2005 2:31:32 PM PST by elkfersupper

The Weyco Inc. executive who gained global attention earlier this year for his tough anti-tobacco workplace policy is under fire again.

Howard Weyers, founder of the Okemos-based benefits administrator, has been accused of sexual harassment. Weyco Inc. also is named as a defendant in the lawsuit filed Oct. 19 in the Ingham County Circuit Court by former employee Christine Ramon.

A response to the lawsuit hasn't been filed, but attorney Erin Gravelyn of the Dickinson Wright law firm said she will "defend the claims vigorously" for Weyco and Weyers.

Ramon said she was advised to not talk about the case by her attorney, Carolyn Bovee.

The suit alleges Weyers harassed Ramon several times in 2002, including:

• Hugging Ramon

• Massaging her shoulders

• Inserting his finger in her ear

• Grabbing her buttocks

• Forcibly turning her around to embrace her.

The lawsuit also states that Weyco failed to act when Ramon complained.

Ramon is seeking a judgment of more than $100,000.

Weyco became famous last year when it terminated four employees who refused to take a test to determine whether they used tobacco products.

Since then, the company has been featured in newspapers and television news shows around the world.

Sunday's episode of CBS' "60 Minutes" featured an interview with Weyers, who talked about the company's policy.

In a statement, Gravelyn questioned the timing of the lawsuit.

"The timing and circumstances of the filing of the suit suggest that the plaintiff is attempting to take advantage of the attention Mr. Weyers and the company have received by bringing the smoking issue into the national forum," Gravelyn said. "That is unfortunate."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: antismoking; puff; pufflist; schadenfreude; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
While I generally don't like these kinds of lawsuits........BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Can you say Schadenfreude?

1 posted on 11/09/2005 2:31:33 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz

Ping.


2 posted on 11/09/2005 2:32:28 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

This one is a laugher... smoking by employees on their own time bad, sexual harassment by the boss on company time good.


3 posted on 11/09/2005 2:34:14 PM PST by thoughtomator (Bring Back HUAC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Gotta' be careful what you ask for from the Nanny State........you might just get it.


4 posted on 11/09/2005 2:35:43 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Live by the PC sword...die by the PC sword.


5 posted on 11/09/2005 2:35:44 PM PST by samadams2000 (Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
I can see it now.

"Quit smoking."

"No."

"Quit smoking, or you're fired."

"I don't think so."

"Well, maybe, just let me put my......finger.....in your.....ear."

"GOTCHA!."

6 posted on 11/09/2005 2:48:35 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Gee, there goes all the savings!!!
Tee-hee.
He can use all the insurance savings to pay his sex-harass attorneys.


7 posted on 11/09/2005 3:26:50 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

"...terminated four employees who refused to take a test to determine whether they used tobacco products." If this guy was instrumental in that action, I am pleased he is being sued. I hope the babe takes him down big-time! He is, clearly, a really mean spirited bastard!


8 posted on 11/09/2005 3:27:26 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

This could be a bogus lawsuit designed to "get back" at the owner. I hope it's not, and she takes him to the cleaners if it's true, though.


9 posted on 11/09/2005 3:29:18 PM PST by Siouxz ( Freepers are the best!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier
If this guy was instrumental in that action, I am pleased he is being sued. I hope the babe takes him down big-time! He is, clearly, a really mean spirited bastard!

He instituted it. He owns the company.

10 posted on 11/09/2005 3:31:57 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Siouxz
I hope it's not

It smells like it is, and I hope she takes him to the cleaners anyway.

11 posted on 11/09/2005 3:33:11 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; nopardons; metesky; Mears; ...

This is just too bloody funny!!!!!!!!!!!

I have also read that Weyers has admitted he has no idea if smoking employees cost more than non-smoking employees


12 posted on 11/09/2005 7:17:24 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha !


13 posted on 11/09/2005 7:35:52 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

My memory may be faulty but I remember this same firm being the lawyers that drafted the no smoking policy but they are now suing Weyco..."attorney Erin Gravelyn of the Dickinson Wright law firm "...conflict of interest?


14 posted on 11/09/2005 7:44:28 PM PST by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oystir

Oops, nevermind, they are defending the company too, in addition to writing the no smoking policy.


15 posted on 11/09/2005 7:46:05 PM PST by Oystir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; elkfersupper

I'm like elkfersupper, I don't like these types of lawsuits, but in this caseI truly hope it is not a frivolous suit and actually has merit.


16 posted on 11/09/2005 7:51:37 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

>>>>Inserting his finger in her ear

Huh? Why would you do this?

EEeeewww!


17 posted on 11/09/2005 7:56:56 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Come to think of it - you're right. That is gross.


18 posted on 11/09/2005 8:16:17 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

oops. LOL.


19 posted on 11/09/2005 8:27:28 PM PST by patton ("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: patton

You're funny!!!!!!!!

And I just realized, I'm tired and don't feel like falling asleep on my keyboard.

Talk to you tomorrow, my FRiend :)


20 posted on 11/09/2005 8:33:23 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson