Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For First Time, Pennsylvania Voters Oust a Supreme Court Justice
AP News ^ | November 9, 2005 | Peter Jackson

Posted on 11/09/2005 1:58:41 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Kaslin

TENN ousted one a few years ago, because she was anti-death penalty. We nearly got a second a few years later, but he was black and screamed racisim very loud.


21 posted on 11/09/2005 4:55:48 AM PST by GailA (Glory be to GOD and his only son Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is a good result, and it sends a clear message to the PA legislature. The (illegal) pay raise issue will not go away. We will remember in the 2006 primary and general elections.


22 posted on 11/09/2005 4:57:05 AM PST by ILikeFriedman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

"make sure you vote against your state rep AND senator if they're up for election next year too."

I'll try, but that usually means voting for a Dem. Sometimes, I just don't vote FOR certain candidates, or the opponents.

Do any of you other PA voters know why PA is one of only FOUR states to have a full-time legislature? Is there any way to change that?


23 posted on 11/09/2005 5:00:56 AM PST by Ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: the tongue

Both getting voted out.


24 posted on 11/09/2005 5:10:44 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The big no votes came in the south central and Pittsburgh. Hopefully, this is a harbinger that a lot of legislators will be replaced by conservatives in primaries and the newcomers will be more willing to buck the Philly & suburban cow-milking machines.

And we do want to pin this raise on Rendell.

25 posted on 11/09/2005 5:15:54 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Pennsylvanians have denied a state Supreme Court justice a second term, a sign of the public's anger at lawmakers for pushing through a pay raise last summer.

How do they figure?

26 posted on 11/09/2005 5:17:07 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We in Nebraska did that about 15 years ago when the State Supreme Court started to get out of line. Best thing in the world for reigning in the others. I strongly recommend it.


27 posted on 11/09/2005 5:17:52 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope this means that I will continue to see the giant, pink pig on the news channels from Pittsburgh. They really crack me up!


28 posted on 11/09/2005 5:21:59 AM PST by WV Mountain Mama (You can't spell liberal without the letters L- I- E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It's way past time that the members of our elite, tax-fed class get the message that they are NOT royalty, and they CAN be fired. No incumbent should feel safe if he/she is not working hard at representing what the people want, not what their party wants. We need to start cleaning out incumbents of both parties who won't protect our children, our borders, and our pocketbooks, and who worry more about what the msm thinks than what their constituents think.


29 posted on 11/09/2005 5:26:18 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sweet! I voted NO on retaining both.


30 posted on 11/09/2005 5:29:33 AM PST by TheBigB (<----cooler than the other side of the pillow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I voted :0)


31 posted on 11/09/2005 5:35:08 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Voters will elect a replacement justice to a 10-year term in November 2007.

That's incredible that residents have to wait two years to select a replacement. There will be elections held before then in Pennsylvania.

32 posted on 11/09/2005 5:42:25 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I voted no too. It felt good!


33 posted on 11/09/2005 5:46:26 AM PST by Geoffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
I voted against the b******s

Add a few more letters next time, took me 10 minutes to figure it out, (I thought you spelled bullsh*t wrong)

34 posted on 11/09/2005 5:47:34 AM PST by bigjoesaddle ("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A Democrat, Nigro received strong support in and around his native Philadelphia but was overwhelmed by lopsided margins in south-central and southwestern regions of the state, where opposition to the pay raise was concentrated.

Nervous, Rendell?

I guess the Philly vote-making machine can't get worked up for a mere judicial retention.

It's about time a judge went. They should go more often. The next step is to get the House to impeach at least one federal judge every year.

35 posted on 11/09/2005 5:53:44 AM PST by AmishDude (Amishdude, the one and only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
< mindless democrat mode > Justice Russell M. Nigro, who got 49 percent of vote Tuesday, was the first statewide judge to be turned out of office in a yes-or-no retention election in the 36 years such elections have been held.

They can't do that! It's racist to deprive a Nigro of his income. Unfair! Unfair! Unfair!< /mindless democrat mode >

< republican mode >Hey bozo's it's spelled NIgro. And no one has a constitutional right to an income. (Stupid dems!)

36 posted on 11/09/2005 5:53:56 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is hugh in Pa. We now need to keep the pressure on. Even if they back off the pay raise, we still need to vote out every incumbent.


37 posted on 11/09/2005 6:08:50 AM PST by oldtimer2 (R from Lancaster County)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Nigro did not return a telephone message early Wednesday."

Kinda hard responding when the tongue is busily employed licking wounds.

38 posted on 11/09/2005 6:12:58 AM PST by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Justice Russell M. Nigro, who got 49 percent of vote Tuesday, was the first statewide judge to be turned out of office in a yes-or-no retention election in the 36 years such elections have been held.

A Democrat, Nigro received strong support in and around his native Philadelphia but was overwhelmed by lopsided margins in south-central and southwestern regions of the state, where opposition to the pay raise was concentrated.

Sweet. I bet this'll be all over the "Today" show.

39 posted on 11/09/2005 6:15:09 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A solution to judicial tyranny. Throw the bums out.


40 posted on 11/09/2005 6:40:47 AM PST by weegee (To understand the left is to rationalize how abortion can be a birthright.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson