Posted on 11/07/2005 1:17:22 PM PST by Cplus
Edited on 11/07/2005 1:43:41 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
PARIS (Reuters) - Un mineur et deux jeunes majeurs soupçonnés d'avoir lancé sur internet des appels à l'émeute et à l'agression contre des policiers ont été arrêtés lundi à Aix-en-Provence et en région parisienne, apprend-on de source judiciaire.
Les trois "blogs" utilisés, des sites internet personnels, étaient hébergés sur le site de la radio Skyrock, qui les a désactivés durant le week-end.
"Les sites incitaient à participer aux mouvements généraux de violences urbaines et à attaquer des policiers et des commissariats", a déclaré à Reuters un magistrat du parquet de Paris.
Le parquet devait décider dans la journée de l'éventuelle ouverture d'une information judiciaire, une enquête étant jugée nécessaire pour déterminer les éventuelles attaches politiques des suspects et savoir si leur démarche procède ou non d'une entreprise organisée.
Les suspects encourront jusqu'à cinq ans de prison si la qualification pressentie pour les faits, "incitation à commettre des agressions contre des personnes", est retenue.
5 years in French prison (one of Europe's worst) for internet writings.
Is there anyone less tolerant of dissent than "liberals"?
Nice headline change.
And incitement to riot isn't protected free speech.
Well now wait just a minute. I can't have a website here in America that says to attack cops, especially if a riot is already underway. I really just don't think this is a free speech issue, even by our own standards.
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",
---
If they would have called for the attacks to be US police officers, everything would be fine.
Liberals as usual, can say whatever you want, as long as we ok it.
hree arrests for incentive with the riot on "blog"
Even Reuters wouldn't be as blatant with their headline as your change was. And that's saying something.
"the sites encouraged to take part in the general movements of urban violences and to attack police officers and police stations",
*****
Could it be we're trying not to use the "M" word here? Sounds like content was provided courtesy of TROP.
I hear North Korea has a slightly harsher punishment. A bullet.
Censorship? F***, this is about protecting society from those who openly seek to destroy it. Hope they shoot these bastards....
Inciting a riot is not free speech. I hope they send these "free speech" advocates to jail for a long time.
Perhaps DU would suit you better?
Cplus
Since Oct 10, 2005
The sites were apparently inciting people to violence and attacks on police. Hardly reason to be incensed about a violation of dissenting free speech rights.
Meanwhile, thousands in the streets burn France.
Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog"
You may also want to brush up on your French for a proper translation.
We have a troll!
Ok so let me get this right. Paris is burning to the ground, crazy Muslims are taking over, but by George we gotta arrest those durn bloggers!!! Glad to see we have our priorities straight here!!
Gees!!
The correct title is:
"Trois arrestations pour incitation à l'émeute sur "blog" "
which translated is:
"Three arrested for incitement to riot, in their blogs".
It's a little different than claiming their free speech rights were violated.
I don't see the word "Muslims" on this report....do you?
Yup ... a typical imbecile.
He thinks we're as stupid as he is. LOL!
Are you a troll or just confused about the difference between inciting violence and public discourse?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.