Posted on 11/05/2005 2:15:22 PM PST by wagglebee
Would you get P.O.’d if . . .
1. Your ten-year old son was kidnapped out of your front yard by two pedophiles and then taken to a taxpayer funded public library and shown, via the internet, a website that displays men having sex with boys?
2. Or, after your son had been force-fed this sick crap, the two kidnappers tried to sexually assault your boy? Would that make your blood boil?
3. Or how about after your son warded off the initial attempted assault, these sick SOBs killed your child by choking him with a gasoline saturated rag, then molested his corpse and discarded his carcass in a cement filled container? I’m guessing that would push most parents straight over the anger edge.
4. And what if after these human pieces of feces are thrown into prison for life (a light sentence in my book), some organization actually defended NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association), the host of the website, and their first amendment right to advocate adult men having sex with underage boys and in no ways sees NAMBLA as culpable in aiding or abetting this crime against your kid?
Is that wrong in your eyes? It is in mine.
This scenario from hell is exactly what Mr. and Mrs. Curley, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, went through a few years ago in the kidnapping and murder of their son Jeffery and the subsequent civil suit they filled against nefarious NAMBLA, which the ACLU defended.
Now, before I go off on the ACLU, here’s a little 411 FYI regarding the indefensible NAMBLA crew. And if you want to be really shocked, Google them, then go to their website and see for yourself.
1. NAMBLA states that it’s OK for men to sodomize boys. Consensual sodomization, of course.
2. NAMBLA wants the legal boundaries prohibiting sex with young boys lifted. They call these common sense, currently ‘no duh’ prohibitions arcane impediments, i.e. “ageisms,” which keep them from pursuing their hellish hopes of happiness.
3. NAMBLA instructs their seriously twisted members on how they can get away with raping your kid.
4. NAMBLA distributes kiddie porn, which is now, by the way, a multi-billion dollar industry.
5. NAMBLA publishes a rag titled: The Survival Manual: The Man’s Guide to Staying Alive in Man-Boy Sexual Relationships that seeks to aid the God forsaken in such things as: a) how to be a more effective predator, b) how to maneuver your way into the families of kids you’d like to rape and how to win the parents’ confidence, c) the best places to go to molest children so that you wont get caught, and finally, d) what to do if you should get busted.
6. The Curley’s attorney, Larry Frisoli, stated in the civil suit against NAMBLA that not only does NAMBLA have the nerve to state that man/boy sex is cool, but they also have a little network going in which they trade live children among members for the purpose of having sex with them.
And what does the ACLU do about the aforementioned funk? Well, they defend these sexual deviants and their “right” to dole out this despicable dirt.
Now, before the reflexive left gets there neckerchiefs and their thongs in an irreversible knot, I’m not homophobic. And I couldn’t care less what adults do with other adults in the privacy of their own homes. If men want to have sex with other men, let ‘em have at it. Just don’t expect me to wear a special ribbon in support of it or to cheer it on during the Testicle Parade when you march through my city, OK?
The axe I have to grind is with the criminal advocacy of men seducing and raping underage boys. At this point, I believe (as do billions of other people worldwide) that you need to go. But the ACLU sees these atrocious acts as defendable freedoms and beliefs that, although we might not share, are legitimate rights all the same. As far as I’m concerned, as soon as you promote, aid and abet, or actually carry out the violation of a child, the only, only, right you have is either life in prison, the electric chair or a lethal injection.
The ACLU, on-the-other-hand, will joyfully exploit your kid and put them in harm’s way by defending child pornography and such banal and base organizations such as NAMBLA.
And they do so with the typical broad-brush stroke of, “it might not be everyone’s taste, but who are we to judge?” Yes, the ACLU sees this type of “speech” as that which falls way short of speech that should be prohibited. Oh, really? Where does one have to go nowadays to have his frontal lobe scraped so that he buys into this stuff without blinking?
In short, the ACLU will . . .
1. Oppose the prosecution of those who distribute and sell kiddie porn.
2. Strike down laws prohibiting sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of schools and day care centers.
3. Defend repeat offending pedophiles, now out of prison, from being forbidden to frequent public parks—because that would be discrimination. The ACLU defends the sickest chumps in the world and their right to criminal happiness.
4. Work to protect vile, criminal and damaging conduct. They’ll even help the pervs get access to parks and places so they can prey on your kids.
5. Auger for private institutions such as the Boy Scouts to have queer scoutmasters.
6. Insist that parents do not have to be informed about their underage daughter’s abortion and that abortion should be performed without knowledge or permission of the mom and dad.
* If you want more frightening info regarding the ACLU, see Alan Sears’ book, The ACLU vs. America.
In short, the ACLU would like to see a big bridle slapped on parents, churches and synagogues in regards to the moral education of their children. But, other than that, they’re a pretty good organization (cough).
But don’t let any of the above bother you. The football game is on, you’re stressed out enough as it is with all the other cares of the world, and it’ll probably never happen to your child anyways. Or will it?
Well, let’s hope not. And not only can we hope not, but we can be on the lookout for this criminal bunk and we can send our hard earned cash to the Alliance Defense Fund which is tackling the ACLU’s asininities on a regular basis.
Now, before the reflexive left gets there neckerchiefs and their thongs in an irreversible knot, I’m not homophobic. And I couldn’t care less what adults do with other adults in the privacy of their own homes. If men want to have sex with other men, let ‘em have at it. Just don’t expect me to wear a special ribbon in support of it or to cheer it on during the Testicle Parade when you march through my city, OK?
If the leftists want to destroy themselves that is their decision. But they must be stopped before they destroy American society.
Homosexual agenda/Moral absolutes ping.
Unfortunately Doug concedes to the ACLU half their agenda by simply embracing the phony term, homophobe.
"HOMOPHOBE!"
/sarc
homophobe
A phobia is a FEAR - I do not fear these perverted POS piles of crap.
>> I read an article a while back about him receiving cash donations from a network of NAMBLA members.
Here is a link to the story: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/825296671.html?did=825296671&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&date=Apr+22%2C+2005&author=J.M.+Lawrence&pub=Boston+Herald&desc=Boy%27s+mom+probes+killer+over+%24+ties+to+%60Man-Boy%27+group
He is at MCI Concord, not Cedar Junction.
Thanks - will ping the list later!
Do you know anything about the SCOTUS ruling on Stogner vs Calif? If not, your outrage is not fully developed yet.
No difference, really, between NAMBLA and muslims terrorists. They both espouse evil with their own personal satisfaction in mind.
The ACLU can strike nothing down, they have no judicial authority. And as I've been saying, the feds should have handled this case from the start. If they had, the perps would have gone to the chair already.
You support it.
What makes you say I support it?
What is really horrid is that we know if someone tried to set up a Nativity scene on the Library lawn or tried to conduct a Bible study at the local public school the ACLU would have done all they could to quash these actions.
More alarming than ACLU advocacy of child molestation is the growing trend among some sociologist and psychologists who claim adult child sex is not harmful and may even be beneficial to the child. Needless to say they don't call it molestation they call it intergenerational sex.
The goal is to make adult molestation of a child acceptable.
If you think it is never gonna happen, think of how the movie Kinsey was lauded by mainstream critics. Kinsey used the observations of child molestors as part of his research.
personally, and I say this as serious as a hear attack, if thos scum bags had done that to MY son, they wouldn't have lived long enough to make it to trial. I swear if someone touched my child they would pay with their life, by my hand , period!! As god as my witness, I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep over it and I wouldn't fear for my immortal soul either.
I cannot wait for the day that some parent does this and the country becomes embroiled in a good vs. evil fight over this issue because I believe there are more of us than them and we would finally prevail in eliminating this element of equality for this criminal scum once and for all!
Vigilante justice should be legalized for this one instance. Parents of these poor children should be allowed to hunt these bastards down and with impunity take their revenge.
In cases such as this one all it takes is good aim, a hefty bag and a shovel for justice to triumph.
Just a few months ago I told my husband that the day would come when children could be molested and it would be legal. He told me I was crazy. All one has to do is look at our country today and see how saturated it is with sex. Just today there was a trailer for a movie coming out and a small boy about 10 or 12 was consumed by boobs. But then pay attention children today are used for sexual jokes in tv and movies all the time now. Then check out the history of sex with children. In the time of the Romans it was considered an honor for a young boy to be there to take care of a soldiers needs. Not only that but my brother was murdered and it was a hate crime. Get it he hated him because he didn't like his looks. And yes his death was equal to that of Matthew Sheperds and I dare anyone to say different. That is the real truth about hate. Hate crosses all lines of cutural in this country. One is black, homosexual, christian, or working at the world trade center. That is the truth about hatred. No one is so special that their life is more important than anyone elses. That is what holds us all together as a human race.
"Google them, then go to their website and see for yourself."
NO WAY!!! I'd never go to that website or encourage anyone else to do so. I'd hate to die in my sleep and someone find that website in my computer history. Besides, why make them happy with the increased number of hits on their web?
No thanks; anything I need to know about these depraved individuals I'll get from other sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.