Posted on 11/04/2005 6:52:17 AM PST by Fiji Hill
Is Muslim a Dirty Word in Hollywood?
Updated 8:47 AM ET November 4, 2005This week's "Give Me a Break" goes to Sony Pictures, the movie company, for getting so upset about a "bad" word in the title of one of their movies.
The movie is titled "Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World." And apparently that word "Muslim" is a problem.
In the film, the U.S. State Department, which wants the Muslim world to like us, is determined to find out what makes Muslims laugh.
The movie was written by and stars comedian Albert Brooks, playing himself. Summoned to Washington, Brooks is given the assignment: Go to India and Pakistan, write a 500-page report and find out what makes Muslims laugh.
What's controversial about that? The movie is a comedy about humor and cultural differences.
Brooks says he wanted to make this movie because after September 11th, he felt, Americans hated even the word "Muslim."
"A part of me always thought that, you know, what are there, a billion-and-a-half Muslim people on this planet and I never thought that all of them wanted us dead," says Brooks. "So I thought, what could I do to make a movie in, you know, my style, to sort of soften this subject?”
Sony Pictures, the film's distributor, planned to premiere the movie in October. Brooks described screening the movie for Sony executives.
"It went very well," Brooks says. "Posters were made, trailers were made. And then about three months later, on a Monday morning, I get this phone call: 'We can't release the movie with the title.'"
The call came shortly after a Newsweek story in May 2005 claimed that soldiers at Guantanamo Bay had flushed a Koran down the toilet and rioting broke out in the Middle East.
It turned out that the story was wrong; Newsweek retracted it. And the rioting may have been a previously planned anti-American demonstration that had nothing to do with Newsweek. But Sony Picture's president, Michael Lynton, still said he'd refuse to release a film called "Looking for Comedy in the Muslim World."
Brooks says that Sony representatives told him that "the world has changed and we don't really think we should put the word 'Muslim' in the title."
Please! How cowardly. Hollywood used to make lots of big-star, big-budget movies about Arab terrorists, like "Executive Decision," "Rules of Engagement" and "True Lies," but since September 11th, they're rare.
Tom Clancy's best-selling novel, "The Sum of All Fears" is about Palestinian terrorists. But when the movie, starring Ben Affleck, came out, the bad guys became European neo-Nazis.
Studios now routinely meet with Arab-American groups for sensitivity input to avoid demonstrations in front of theaters showing their films.
Sensitivity is good, but now Sony won't even use "Muslim" in a title? Los Angeles Times columnist Patrick Goldstein points out that Sony is the same company that glorifies sex and crass materialism by pushing sleazy movies like "Deuce Bigelow, European Gigolo."
Movies like "Deuce Bigalow" give far more offense to Muslims than "Looking for Comedy ..." would. "Fifty thousand times more than my movie ever could," Brooks says.
I wanted to ask Sony why "European Gigolo" is good to release, but Brooks' film wasn't, but they wouldn't agree to an interview. They did say they wish Mr. Brooks well.
Brooks, meanwhile, says he hasn't gotten any pressure from Muslim groups. In fact, Brooks has been invited to have the world premiere of the film at the Dubai Film Festival in the United Arab Emirates. "And we're going," Brooks says.
Good for him. And good for Warner Independent Pictures for releasing the movie -- with the title intact.
"It turned out that the story was wrong; Newsweek retracted it. And the rioting may have been a previously planned anti-American demonstration that had nothing to do with Newsweek."
Revisionism is alive and well!
Good luck Albert, we can use a LOT of humour....
Why did the chicken cross the road? Because the IED threw him there! Allah Akbar.
In the 1970's almost every movie had buffoons wrapped in sheets acting like Ali-G.
And "Christian" is downright evil!
The rioting MAY have been previously planned, but the deaths were a direct result of the Newsweek article.
"what makes Muslims laugh"?
Butchering schoolchildren? Beheading teachers of children?
They got the wrong Brooks, they need old Mel to straighten this mess out. Send over a couple a Imans to check out that quicksand.
Brooks says he wanted to make this movie because after Auschwitz, he felt, Jews hated even the word "Nazi."
Maybe they could have called the movie: "Muslim Men Can't Laugh."
And Stalin may not have killed 80 million in the USSR, it was probably just a mass-suicide.
I like Albert Brooks and this is just his sort of movie. I'll be interested to hear more about it.
Then why is it that every movie about terrorism Hollywood produces ends up with white guys as the terrorists.
Albert Brooks has always been one of my favorite actor/directors, "Defending Your Life" is in my Top 5.
I like that one a lot too. : ~ ))
Why were the bad guys in The Sum of All Fears changed from Muslims to White Supremists? Because Muslims actually want to nuke Denver.
He probably didn't have to look very hard. Those Muslims are a wacky, zany, fun loving group.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.