Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: icwhatudo
I read an article recently where the RATS claim the attacks on Michael are not racial because the "N" word was not used. Unbelievable. Man can they spin definitions!

Mike was on Laura Ingram this am. You can sign up to help Mike HERE.

115 posted on 11/04/2005 10:38:36 AM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: lizma
It is pretty much known that if you call a black person an "oreo" you are saying that he is black on the outside and white on the inside. Thus, it is an insult, and it is racial in its intent. Similarly, if you are making jokes about "fried chicken, watermelon, and collard greens" you may be accused of being racial, even if the "N" word isn't used.

So, my question would be: If there was no racial intent in the "oreo" incident, then why did they use "oreos" instead of some other cookie, like oatmeal, or sugar, or peanut butter?

Their spin is weak, and doesn't work. They are disgusting.

137 posted on 11/04/2005 2:24:00 PM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson