Replies

I found out about the restrictions on diagnosis of children, by reading the DSM IV. My concern is that the counselor of these children(that I'm mentioning) is merely a social security scam, on the part of the mother.

The mother told the counselor that the oldest one was bipolar. The girl's problem is that she didn't want to put up with her mom's crazy BS. Mommy is a meth addict. She convinced the counselor that the girl is bipolar, and put her on Social Security. After the claim went through, mommy spent the first check(it accures from the day you put in your claim), on a car for herself. The girl doesn't see or get to use that monthly check.

She told her daddy that she didn't know she was anymore, last year. Now the mother and her bf are working the 13 yr old. Disgusting.

The schools aren't much better than disfunctional parents.

That sounds like it's a case of fraud, and should be easier to resolve than the overal agenda of forced drugging will be. That is, unless the counselor is in on it somehow. It's interesting that the mother's a speed freak, considering the nature of some of the drugs kids have to take.

My concern was more with the overall picture. This is disapproved of in the DSM and prohibited by law - yet both the DSM and law are ignored. That's a problem. Usually parent's wishes are not considered. Often there's no exam to see if the kid can tolerate the drugs. More problems.

Biggest problem: The agenda that lead to the mass forcible drugging of kids. Why it's being done; and which kids are picked for forced drugging. That, when understood, is nightmare stuff.