Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: saquin
And that convoluted solution would be better at preserving the royal "line" than allowing females would be?

Because it keeps it male.
12 posted on 11/03/2005 8:19:28 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: festus
Because it keeps it male.

Obviously. I realize that. I'm questioning the whole idea because if gender trumps bloodline (a distant male cousin, adopted into the line, is preferred over a direct female descendant) than why bother with a royal bloodline at all?

14 posted on 11/03/2005 8:24:52 PM PST by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson