Posted on 11/02/2005 7:03:16 AM PST by Wolfie
You are missing the point. Cities do not exist because people simply vote to create them. The vote to create the city and the authority to hold the people to it comes from the state. The state controls state laws for all people and what the cities may control. Cities are not anarchical entities that operate without state oversight. Cities are located within the state and are subject to state law.
ping
So then, you're in favor of the federal government being able to overrule state laws?
That's the next step in your logic - states aren't states until they're recognized as such by the Feds, after all.
If voters want marijuana legal at the local level, than the local LEOs should step aside. Let the State Police expend time and resources to thwart the will of the local voters.
Agreed.
"So then, you're in favor of the federal government being able to overrule state laws? "
Jeez, put down the pot pipe, will ya? How are cities subject to state law because they are located within the state and are created by the powers of the state related to federal powers trumping state powers when the states exist without the federal government and in fact create the federal government?
Did you TOTALLY miss out on government lessons in school???
We know how this goes. If he disagrees with the will of the voters, of course he wants the next level of gov't to override it.
A word about the commerce clause highlights how politicians and bureaucrats knowingly violate their oath to uphold the constitution. Several laws are based on misconstrued meaning of the commerce clause Most absurd are laws asserted to be based on the commerce clause that are acts that take place within a state's borders, never crossing state borderline.
Possession can never involve interstate commerce. Only the transportation of a possession can involve interstate commerce. ...And only when the object possessed crosses from one state to another.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the following in Lopez:
"Put simply, much if not all of Art. I, 8 (including portions of the Commerce Clause itself) would be surplusage if Congress had been given authority over matters that substantially affect interstate commerce. An interpretation of cl. 3 that makes the rest of 8 superfluous simply cannot be correct. Yet this Court's Commerce Clause jurisprudence has endorsed just such an interpretation: the power we have accorded Congress has swallowed Art. I, 8."
bump your post.
An excellent summary. Thank you. Thomas makes an excellent point. One wonders why fireworks don't receive the same scrutiny.
What I wonder is how the state attorney general will enforce the state law if the municipal PD no longer do it for him.
If it were not for the petro chemical and paper pulp industries this country could save billions per year in LEO and housing prisoners charged with pot crimes, not to mention freeing the courts of this nonsense and gaining additional revenue from taxing it.
Government officials -- congress -- amended the constitution so that the two senators of each state were elected by the people. A state with large metropolitan population such as NYC, LA, Chicago, Boston etc., would in effect elect the two senators. Leaving the rural population of the state not represented--disenfranchised.
The founders were wise and knew it was best to have the more numerous and more local Representatives appoint the two state Senators. That way the people in all areas of the state would be represented--not just the large population areas of a state.
Under fire from domestic-violence groups, SAFER also pulled a controversial billboard that showed a battered woman and her abuser with the slogan "Reduce family and community violence in Denver. Vote Yes on I-100."
Too bad they couldn't be honest about it, but considering who they are I'm not surprised.
Newbie warrior? Or retread from the last time you were booted?
What was your previous screen name?
Looking for a fight or just think more of yourself than anyone else does?
Gen 1: 11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so. 12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good...
Gen 2: ...8 Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 And the LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground—trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil...
...15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."
I like brownies...
It's the same level of honesty as we've come to expect from your Drug Warrior buddies, starting with Harry Anslinger and 'Reefer Madness' in the 1930's and leading up to today's deceptive PSAs from the Drug Czar's office.
Not to mention the most recent PSAs, where the message is that it's OK for a parent to be a hypocrite. Gotta love that one ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.