Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

It sounds like Russert audiotaped his conversation with Libby for Fitzgerald to make the assertion which he did regarding the conversation between Libby and Russert. What are the laws in New York and Washington D.C. regarding taping conversations?


255 posted on 10/29/2005 10:15:49 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Songwriter

I'm not really sure, but I think it's permissible when it hurts the Republicans and a hanging offense when it harms the Demonrats.


256 posted on 10/29/2005 10:18:02 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Songwriter
What are the laws in New York and Washington D.C. regarding taping conversations?

I doubt it makes any difference in terms of admissibility into a criminal trial. Law enforcement had nothing to do with the taping. Recall it was illegal for Linda Tripp to tape Monica Lewinski but those tapes were allowed in.

262 posted on 10/29/2005 11:10:47 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Songwriter
What are the laws in New York and Washington D.C. regarding taping conversations?

One part notification in both states, so it should have been legal for Russert to record Libby without Libby's knowledge. (Link to source on post #28)

Even an illegal recording might be admissible, as with Tripp's recordings of Lewinski.

267 posted on 10/29/2005 12:17:14 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson