Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2005 4:31:46 PM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Crackingham

Yeah, Aquaman has a lot of nerve, and I remember him behaving similarly during Clinton's term.


2 posted on 10/28/2005 4:33:11 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Teddy, just shut up and drink your way through it like you have every administration since your brother's.


3 posted on 10/28/2005 4:33:30 PM PDT by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Today is an ominous day for the country, signifying a new low since Watergate in terms of openness and honesty in our government.

Too quote the Late Great Dean Wormer: "Fat Drunk and Stupid is no way to go through life!"

4 posted on 10/28/2005 4:33:58 PM PDT by Bommer (TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

typical

Doogle


5 posted on 10/28/2005 4:34:06 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF...7thAF ..4077th TFW...408th MMS..Ubon Thailand.."69",,Night Line Delivery..AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Kennedy who?


6 posted on 10/28/2005 4:34:45 PM PDT by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Gee, I didn't know non-sequiturs could be used to make mountains of molehills.
7 posted on 10/28/2005 4:34:46 PM PDT by Buzwardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Quite a stretch, Fat Teddy. Now let's re-examine YOUR actions of some years ago involving a young lady named Mary Jo........shall we, you d**khead?


9 posted on 10/28/2005 4:35:10 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

ROTFLMAO!
"Failed Bush presidency."

Have another drink, Swimmer.
You're in for 3 more years of Bush's presidency.


10 posted on 10/28/2005 4:36:47 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Today is an ominous day for the country, signifying a new low since Watergate in terms of openness and honesty in our government.

Was he freaking asleep during the 90's?

11 posted on 10/28/2005 4:36:48 PM PDT by SaveTheChief ("I can't wait until I'm old enough to feel ways about stuff." - Phillip J. Fry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

"It was a dark and stormy night . . . ."


14 posted on 10/28/2005 4:38:50 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

If I had been President, (hic) those 2,000 promising lives would have been at the bottom of a creek, or maybe in lower-level diplomatic careers that they weren't entitled to. (hic) Or at least working at Wal-Mart. Well anyway I'd be more satisfied with the outcome (hic) than this travesty of lies, lies that resulted in Qusay and Uday being dead-ay and Saddam being one-foot-in-the-grave-ay. (hic) Where's my intern?


15 posted on 10/28/2005 4:39:09 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

It wasn't me...nor was it the dog...Must have been Teddy' statement being released, not flatus that made that noise...


16 posted on 10/28/2005 4:39:46 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Liberals - Stuck on Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

17 posted on 10/28/2005 4:40:25 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

" . . . openness and honesty . . . "

This killer has the audacity to speak about openness and honesty? Every time he opens his mouth to spew his venom, I want to throw up.


18 posted on 10/28/2005 4:40:49 PM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Teddy has finally lost his last marble. Must have had an extra drink last night. Nowhere in his statement is he on topic. Usually his ramblings at least have a vague reference to the subject at hand.


19 posted on 10/28/2005 4:41:36 PM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
This is far more than an indictment of an individual. In effect it's an indictment of the vicious and devious tactics used by the Administration to justify a war we never should have fought

It's also an indictment for Bush not signing Kyoto, prisoner abuse at Abu Graib, people that leave someone to die in a car that you just drove off a bridge, bananas turning black too soon, ..............

20 posted on 10/28/2005 4:44:14 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the magic word..."Watergate".


21 posted on 10/28/2005 4:44:20 PM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Disgusting, as so many of the comments today.

High time for the Administration and the GOP to fight back.

Just want to make one point: Many here at FR have asked and been upset about the fact that the WH never argued forcefully for the connection between various terror groups and Iraq under Saddam Hussein. And this despite WTC 1993, and all other links that have been discussed at FR.

Now, when the conflict between the CIA and the WH has been made so blatantly clear it is also understandably why the WH couldn't go beyond pretty bland statements on the connection between al Quada and Iraq: the "leaks" from the CIA would have turned into a flood. No matter that the analysts at the CIA probably are as wrong as they were about the assassination attempt against the Pope, the onslaught in the MSM would have been horrendous.

It is more than unfortunate that Mr Libby couldn't convey himself in such a way that it would have been impossible to indict him. The story will now be on the so called "perjury and the smear campaign" from the WH, when it really should be on the "sources" in the CIA.

Maybe Novak will help us out.
22 posted on 10/28/2005 4:44:36 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Something has to give — America can't stand three more years of this failed Bush presidency.

This sounds suspicious like an incitement to insurrection. I mean ... think about it logically. If America really "can't stand three more years of this failed Bush presidency" then, it sounds to me like, Kennedy is encouraging someone(s) to overthrow Bush so that the country doesn't have to go through the next three years.

I say: arrest the fat, alcohol soak bastard, try him for treason, and shoot him. NOW. Put him out of our misery.
23 posted on 10/28/2005 4:47:25 PM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
It's an indictment of the lengths Administration officials were willing to go to cover up their failed intelligence,

Speaking of "cover-ups", "failed intelligence" and immunizing " the country against any further corruption and dishonesty":

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

26 posted on 10/28/2005 4:50:59 PM PDT by fat city ("The nation that controls magnetism controls the world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson