Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA HAPPY ABOUT INDICTMENTS
Fox News with John Gibson ^ | 10/28/2005 | Self

Posted on 10/28/2005 2:30:39 PM PDT by marty60

Just heard a blurb from John Gibson's alter ego. Megan? CIA happy about indictments, claiming they were being FORCED to make a case for War against Iraq.

Well the snakes are crawling out from under the rock.

(Excerpt) Read more at .www.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cia; cialeak; cialeaks; foxnews; johngibson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
Clean the hate America firsters out of the CIA
1 posted on 10/28/2005 2:30:40 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marty60

This should give GWB something to work on!


2 posted on 10/28/2005 2:31:48 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Full out war with the CIA is PAST due. Let's roll.


3 posted on 10/28/2005 2:32:04 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

America is dead.


4 posted on 10/28/2005 2:32:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
I'm sure the CIA is thrilled, seeing how during the discovery process we'll find out that liberals not only think the CIA is a travel agency, but an employment agency. And not only that, how the CIA can be used by liberals to undermine a president *we* elected.

Yeah. I bet the CIA is giddy.

5 posted on 10/28/2005 2:33:13 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

OMG.

This is what it's going to turn into all next year.

Just let's make sure that the media knows that we know this:

Weapons of Mass Destruction

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime . He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction . So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


6 posted on 10/28/2005 2:33:23 PM PDT by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Who is the CIA??? They act like one unknown source is the 'CIA'. What a crook.


7 posted on 10/28/2005 2:33:43 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

We should just play the collapse of the twin towers everytime the CIA talks.


8 posted on 10/28/2005 2:37:49 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Megyn Kendall.


9 posted on 10/28/2005 2:39:25 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Yes clean house at Langley..or rather The puzzle Palace!!!!!!!!!!!!
10 posted on 10/28/2005 2:39:53 PM PDT by GregB (Bring back Capt. Michael Scott Speicher!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If this is true then my belief that the CIA (some) have been working to affect AMERICAN politicsis feasible. Clearly ILLEGAL. It's time to clean the RATS out of the CIA.


11 posted on 10/28/2005 2:40:06 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Thanks, she just got her clock cleaned by a former CIA guy. In essence agreeing with us on this matter.


12 posted on 10/28/2005 2:41:38 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marty60

"CIA happy about indictments, claiming they were being FORCED to make a case for War against Iraq."

It's been over a year from the release of the Senate Intel report, and it's forgotten.

The old disinformation campaigns it debunked are rearising.


13 posted on 10/28/2005 2:43:24 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

She's been asking for it all day. She reminded me of that canoe reportette.


14 posted on 10/28/2005 2:43:25 PM PDT by maggief (Who sent Joe Wilson to Niger?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Peach

ping for future reference


15 posted on 10/28/2005 2:46:31 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (Houston, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Thank God for brilliant Freepers. I just wonder how many CIA FRONT companies are on the Oil for Food payroll? Always follow the money. Everyone that has been against fighting the War on Terror are later found to be receivers of Saddamn money. The CIA?

The CIA's behavour in this matter is to sophmoric to be taken seriously as an intelligence agency.

16 posted on 10/28/2005 2:46:33 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Best bet is to simply clean out all the people who were hired under Jimmy Carter. That's going to be 1977-1980 (inclusive).

Most of them would be eligible for retirement.

CIA types have little of the protections applicable to the Civil Service anyway. I would volunteer for this duty myself but I hate personnel people with a passion ~ best thing ever happened to my agency was we had a big fire that burned out the LAWYERS and PERSONNEL~! Oh, happy day!!!

17 posted on 10/28/2005 2:47:47 PM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

Fitzgerald told Terry Moron (ABC) that this wasn't about the Iraq War.


18 posted on 10/28/2005 2:48:23 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

What is Goss doing over there, is he afraid of the spooks at the CIA? He was suppose to be cleaning out that snake pit.


19 posted on 10/28/2005 2:48:26 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Ping to myself. I gotta copy this when I get home.


20 posted on 10/28/2005 2:48:59 PM PDT by Clock King ("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson