Skip to comments.
AP: Charges Don't Directly Address CIA Leak
BREITBART.COM ^
| Oct 28 3:37 PM US/Eastern
| GINA HOLLAND
Associated Press Writer
Posted on 10/28/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
what caused Clinton's impeachment "wasn't that he had an affair with Monica Lewinsky but he lied about it." Wow! How did THIS get by the AP editors?
2
posted on
10/28/2005 1:51:17 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What? A correct headline?
3
posted on
10/28/2005 1:51:22 PM PDT
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
AP: Charges Don't Directly Address CIA Leak They are correct; Joseph Wilson was not indicted today.
4
posted on
10/28/2005 1:52:15 PM PDT
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What I will remember about today---
David Gergen said, just a short time ago, (on CNN or MSNBC) that the White House can't blame it's troubles on an overzealous prosecutor or on being "kn*cked-up" by the press.
I think he meant "knocked-about."
5
posted on
10/28/2005 1:52:29 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
To: Izzy Dunne
6
posted on
10/28/2005 1:53:04 PM PDT
by
marty60
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
WOW! Someone in the press is suggesting this is political?
Get ready, this reporter is going to be dragged to the woodshed by the rest of the "unbiased" reporters in the biz....
7
posted on
10/28/2005 1:53:19 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Levy said the indictment is "very narrow, very focused: it follows, very provable." Until you look at the indictment itself and see it is about he said, he said situations.
8
posted on
10/28/2005 1:53:48 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
there wasn't a crime until there was an investigation.
9
posted on
10/28/2005 1:55:36 PM PDT
by
smonk
To: Izzy Dunne
Wow! How did THIS get by the AP editors? LOL! I did a double take on that too.
I imagine they relaxed their standards this time because the overall goal is to explain how they have a Republican in their cross-hairs.
10
posted on
10/28/2005 1:55:49 PM PDT
by
Gator101
To: All; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Mo1; tubebender
Hat tip to Drudge on this one, by the way!
To: Gator101
Wow! I can't believe someone got it right for a change.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Scooter was indicted on five counts of contradicting a reporter...
At least that's all I could garner from reading the indictment.
13
posted on
10/28/2005 1:58:34 PM PDT
by
telebob
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hat tip to Drudge on this one, by the way! I know people here don't like him much Hannity is doing a great Job on this also. Good analysis, good guests and good points.
14
posted on
10/28/2005 2:00:21 PM PDT
by
Archon of the East
("universal executive power of the law of nature")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Once again, and now after seeing this jacka@@ on TV, Fitzzzzzzzz is an lame excuse for a prosecutor. I've been in the Court system for 27 years, and I know a nut when I see one. Doesn't take much to pass the bar now days, just dumb every exercise with memory with no solid intelligence. Lawyers, salt of the earth, sure, sure, sure. Takes ten to screw in a light bulb, but they have a time finding the burned our bulb, and then looses the socket.
15
posted on
10/28/2005 2:02:09 PM PDT
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: smonk
Which is why we need to stop all these special prosecutions on both sides.
In retrospect, what did having been a senator have to do with the real reasons Ashcroft recused himself????
To: syriacus
David Gergen said, just a short time ago, (on CNN or MSNBC) that the White House can't blame it's troubles on an overzealous prosecutorI didn't catch him, but in a way he's correct: when the leak charges first aired a couple of years ago, Bush, in Pavlovian fashion, rushed to appoint a Special Prosecutor. There was no need for him to do this. Had he declined (especially as it now appears that no "blown cover" statute was violated) the flap would have soon died. So, it can be argued that today's indictment is a direct consequence of Bush's lack of resolve early on.
17
posted on
10/28/2005 2:02:51 PM PDT
by
Salvey
(ancest)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
18
posted on
10/28/2005 2:03:40 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(MSM pseudo reporters use "could, may, and might" when they are lying and spinning.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
D.C. jury
D.C. jury
D.C. jury
D.C. jury
D.C. jury
D.C. jury
19
posted on
10/28/2005 2:04:41 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace Begins in the Womb)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That is correct, Fitzgerald did not charge anyone with the crime of "outing" a covert agent. Is he required to? Of course not. If the evidence doesn't meet the requirements of the statute, he's not going to charge anyone.
I note that the news media still can't get this straight. ABC Radio News led off with, "Valerie Plame was a covert agent."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson