He also has to prove that Fitzgerald was claiming to be surprised by Russert's statement that she worked for the CIA, and not surprised by Russert's comment that all reporter's knew she did.
"During a conversation with Tim Russert of NBC News on July 10 or 11, 2003, Russert asked LIBBY if LIBBY was aware that Wilsons wife worked for the CIA. LIBBY responded to Russert that he did not know that, and Russert replied that all the reporters knew it. LIBBY was surprised by this statement because, while speaking with Russert, LIBBY did not recall that he previously had learned about Wilsons wifes employment from the Vice President."
There probably is someplace where one can read exactly what Libby said, rather than the prosecutor's summation of what Libby said.
I meant "He also has to prove that Libby was..."
Having read the indictment now I think it's pretty thin. Fitzgerald is skating on about 1/8" of ice IMO.
"LIBBY was surprised by this statement because, while speaking with Russert, LIBBY did not recall that he previously had learned about Wilsons wifes employment from the Vice President."
Libby SHOULD NOT have been surprised about Plame's employment with the CIA, HOWEVER, I can understand his surprise that "all reporters knew it." Now...is Russert saying that he never said that to Libby? If Russert remembers differently, the problem for LIbby is that his credibility is much less because he already should have remembered her name.