[singfreedom]

I'm thinking that Libby's "perjury" is more along the lines of not remembering precisely what you said to a long string of people, on a date, something like, 3 years ago. Do you remember exactly what you said to 40 people on a specific date 3 years ago. I sure as hell couldn't------and I also keep copious notes and a detailed day planner. Sometimes my "notes" and day planner don't exactly jive either, and from what this "prosecutor" person implied, this is precisely how "important" this perjury charge!

I, personally, hope Mr. Libby's defense attorneys rip the CIA, and the "closet Clintonista" Wilsons, a new one! Lord knows, they need one. After 9/11 there should have been a wholesale house cleaning at the CIA and those of V. Plame's ilk should have been gone! Who, in their right mind, would have hired a washed-up politico to undertake an important mission anyway? I wouldn't hire either Wilson, in light of past performance, to lick my boots, let alone undertake a "mission" for the CIA! Mr. Libby has no reputation as a liar, Mr. Wilson, on the other hand, does.

[Question_Assumptions]

If Mr. Libby's recollections were simply off, then hopefully that will come out in court and he'll excape conviction. But the examples given during the press conference sounded, if accurate, very difficult to write off as mistakes in recollections.