Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Case Presented to Leak Grand Jury
The Washington Post ^ | 10/27/05 | Carol D. Leonnig and Jim VandeHei

Posted on 10/26/2005 8:06:21 PM PDT by sarkozy

The prosecutor in the CIA leak investigation presented a summary of his case to a federal grand jury yesterday and is expected to announce a final decision on charges in the two-year-long probe tomorrow, according to people familiar with the case.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: cialeak; cialeakplame; trollwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
Libby indictment unsealed on Thursday, with Rove case presented to jury Friday? Does Fitzgerald expect one indictment to make the "aspens" turn in clusters?
1 posted on 10/26/2005 8:06:21 PM PDT by sarkozy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

More darn speculation. Unnamed sources are not worth the paper they are written on.


2 posted on 10/26/2005 8:12:14 PM PDT by lawdude (Err Amerika induces "in-talk-sication".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

Now, we are down to "people familiar with the case"?
From 22 indictments, to Dick Cheney resigning, to Howard Kurtz being a 1/3rd author of this piece...?!!
Somebody help me find my indictment,... said "I gotta find my indictment right now..
I'm lookin' for Rove..
I'm loookin' for Rove

Thank you J. Giels Band


3 posted on 10/26/2005 8:13:50 PM PDT by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

Compost. Rove is clear, Libby a ?. Fitz ain't looking at them at this hour. ;^)


4 posted on 10/26/2005 8:14:14 PM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

SOMETHING has to happen this week. whatever that SOMETHING is, will happen in the next two days.


5 posted on 10/26/2005 8:15:05 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

I am still sticking to my prediction from last night - Libby and Miller are indicted.

But you can also see from this article how the GJ process is stacked against Republicans in DC - any jury they would empanel is demographically likely to indict any republican for any reason.


6 posted on 10/26/2005 8:17:43 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

But you can also see from this article how the GJ process is stacked against Republicans in DC - any jury they would empanel is demographically likely to indict any republican for any reason.

--

My mind thought the exact same thing. If there ever was a GJ which the dems could dream of - that would be it.


7 posted on 10/26/2005 8:19:20 PM PDT by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

The Leak Grand Jury has leaked again?


8 posted on 10/26/2005 8:20:31 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

Absolute fiction reported as fact by a major metropolitan newspaper, and they wonder why their readership is sliding toward zero.


9 posted on 10/26/2005 8:22:19 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (How the hell could Bush have passed up a Ronnie Earle to appoint a Harriet Miers to the Court?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

So it sounds like Rove is in the clear and Libby will probably not be indicted but most likely Wilson is a in deep sh*t. Sweet!!!!


10 posted on 10/26/2005 8:25:46 PM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

INB4TZ.
INB4TI(s).
My bases are covered.


11 posted on 10/26/2005 8:26:19 PM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (Liberals are not optimistic; they are delusional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

how are you drawing this conclusion?


12 posted on 10/26/2005 8:28:13 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

If Fitzgerald was planning on charging Rove, or anybody else, he would not have let the GJ go home today at lunch time. He would have presented the evidence and required them to begin deliberations today.

Oh, and if Fitzgerald doesn't announce anything tomorrow, as predicted in this article, WaPo will have major egg on its face. Not that this has ever stopped them before.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 8:33:18 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy

Really .. Fitz presented his 2-yr long case in 3 hours. Must not be much of a case!


14 posted on 10/26/2005 8:39:57 PM PDT by CyberAnt (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy
Like the jury's forewoman, the majority are African American women who appear to be middle-age or older. The jury includes at least two black men, two older white women and three white men. One trim, agile retiree with white hair often entered the grand jury room with his bicycle helmet in hand.

Don't know what to make of this.

15 posted on 10/26/2005 8:41:33 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy
Image hosted by Photobucket.comDear WaPo and NYTimes: i want my indictments. you promised me indictments... i want my indictments and i want then NOW!!! please...
16 posted on 10/26/2005 8:46:49 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Fitzgerald told the grand jury that Miller was a witness so she isn't going to be indicted.

Sounds like Libby is in the most trouble and Rove they are trying to stick Rove with perjury. I don't know how Rove can be hit with perjury when he was the one that turned over the e-mails saying he had talked with Cooper.


17 posted on 10/26/2005 8:49:18 PM PDT by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy; All
“Fury said to a mouse ...”

(scroll down)

18 posted on 10/26/2005 8:50:21 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarkozy; Admin Moderator

Not banned yet!


19 posted on 10/26/2005 8:54:32 PM PDT by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback

That passage made me verrrry nervous when I read it. Bicycle helmet, indeed.


20 posted on 10/26/2005 9:06:42 PM PDT by Timeout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson