To: jdhljc169
This pretty much confirms my own reading of the Miers documents. And it also confirms my belief that the socially conservative Evangelical leaders who warmly recommended her on the first day didn't have the faintest idea what kind of person she really is. They went purely by what the White House told them--which unfortunately lacked any noticeable relationship with the truth.
3 posted on
10/26/2005 3:21:13 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
We wanted to back the President, and sought evidence to support this nomination"
But none was provided - just attacks against those who questioned her nomination.
6 posted on
10/26/2005 3:36:07 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
To: Cicero
The White House was twisting arms. I find it appalling that Bush and his minions would so overtly try to use conservatives.
40 posted on
10/26/2005 5:21:33 PM PDT by
cynicom
To: Cicero
And it also confirms my belief that the socially conservative Evangelical leaders who warmly recommended her on the first day didn't have the faintest idea what kind of person she really is.
Just like the Naive ones on tis site who were PRAYING for Clinton during his operation ( They can't recognize PURE EVIL when they see it )
43 posted on
10/26/2005 5:23:51 PM PDT by
uncbob
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson