Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Betting This Will Bring Down Bush? No Chance
RealClearPolitics ^ | October 26, 2005 | Mark Davis

Posted on 10/26/2005 1:31:04 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns

Sometimes controversies are not about what they appear to be.

We've been buried in anticipatory stories as reporters giddily anticipate what many of them see as The Next Watergate, the possible indictment of two lofty figures in the Bush White House.

Doubters say this is much ado about nothing, a story completely contrived by those who drool at the prospect of scandal tainting this administration.

What's an objective soul to do?

The first thing to do is question that objectivity. Is it even possible to approach the Karl Rove/"Scooter" Libby/Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame Wilson story with an eye unaffected by politics?

Probably not, so let's all be honest with ourselves. For me, as a general supporter of this president, my default settings are to hope that people I admire do not break the law and to question the motives of those who prematurely presume that laws have been broken.

But with that comes a hefty responsibility. I must have the spine to face it if Mr. Rove and/or Mr. Libby are indicted and to do it without the whining and denials heard from so many Clinton supporters as he faced the music for his prevarications.

At the risk of being dead wrong in a very short time, I am among those predicting that neither Mr. Rove nor Mr. Libby will be indicted for violating the law against revealing the name of a known covert CIA agent.

The only remote possibility I see is special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald viewing any inconsistent testimony from the two as malicious intent to deceive and not just faulty memory.

Rove and Libby enemies can roll their eyebrows at the flawed recollection scenario, but let's review the context.

As right-hand men for the president and vice president, Karl Rove and "Scooter" Libby were properly involved in countering an effort by Joe Wilson, a disgruntled diplomat, to smear the war effort.

A bipartisan Senate committee has now discredited much of the story Mr. Wilson has paraded all over television on his way to becoming an anti-war hero, details ranging from who sparked his trip to Niger to what he found there.

But as the stories were breaking, it was thoroughly understandable for the Bush team to try to question the purity of Mr. Wilson's motives. Once the possibility arose of his CIA wife as a key advocate for his ideologically charged journey, one can additionally imagine a flurry of conversations about the significance of that angle.

So, a year or more later: Quick! Where did you first hear the name "Valerie Plame"? Was it from a reporter? Was it from the vice president? Those are the two answers Mr. Libby apparently gave on separate occasions, leading to yesterday's breathless story in The New York Times.

Egad! Mr. Libby may have heard this woman's name not from a journalist, but from Dick Cheney himself! Stop the presses!

It must have been quite the adrenaline rush three decades ago as reporters gleefully watched the self-destruction of a White House they despised. Many in the current media generation long for that same thrill.

They won't get it. Even if Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby go down, none of their misdeeds, real or imagined, will constitute an anchor heavy enough to drown the Bush presidency.

This White House is gurgling plenty on its own right now, with a Supreme Court nomination that is close to flat-lining and a war that yields good news that no one pays attention to. Between the Plame story and Hurricane Wilma, did anyone notice that the Iraqi constitution was proclaimed officially passed yesterday?

I wonder whether that story would have been so buried if it had failed. Which brings us to what this whole "Plamegate" mess is about: this presidency and this war.

Supporters of both have little time to be bothered with the Wilsons, while detractors long for an early Christmas – indictments that they will spin to discredit President Bush and the war as a whole.

We'll see who's smiling by the weekend.

Mark Davis is a columnist for the Dallas Morning News.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushhaters; cialeak; libby; plame; rove; wilson

1 posted on 10/26/2005 1:31:04 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Justice would be if Wilson were indicted. Maybe it would deter the Dems from conducting these useless investigations.


2 posted on 10/26/2005 1:34:12 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
We'll see who's smiling by the weekend.

I know I will be.
3 posted on 10/26/2005 1:34:44 PM PDT by Haldeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

What's that supposed to mean?

What do you know noob?


4 posted on 10/26/2005 1:44:26 PM PDT by colorcountry (Proud Parent of a Soldier, a UPS Driver, an Executive, a Construction Worker, and a Student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

Oh, and welcome to FR!


5 posted on 10/26/2005 1:45:01 PM PDT by colorcountry (Proud Parent of a Soldier, a UPS Driver, an Executive, a Construction Worker, and a Student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

A lot of us here will be smiling. Welcome to FR. It is the left that will not like the end result of Fitz's investigation...


6 posted on 10/26/2005 1:46:02 PM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Is there anything stopping the Justice Department, other than fear of being criticized by the New York Times, from investigating Wilson on its own for leaking classified information to the press. Wouldn't details of his trip to Niger fall into that category? That isn't part of the Special Prosecutor's charge as I understand it.


7 posted on 10/26/2005 1:47:55 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

Verrry interesting comment. Welcome to Free Republic.


8 posted on 10/26/2005 1:48:24 PM PDT by PilloryHillary (Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

Interesting choice of a handle, HR. Why do you expect to be smiling?


9 posted on 10/26/2005 1:49:15 PM PDT by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
This entire line of news and the giddy celebrations on the left remind me of only one other episode during President Bush's Presidency. That time was the morning and afternoon of November 2, 2004.

The pit in my stomach developed from Exit Polls provided by the AP. Fake Polls from the AP. Lies designed to discourage and depress GOP voters while encouraging Lib voters. The Liberals were giddy and in your face. They were assured and celebratory.

Example: On Friday, George Stephanopoulos said, "On Monday, Republicans will be devastated."

Well, it's Wednesday. I'm not devastated. I've seen people jump from the World Trade Center. Choosing between burning alive or smashing into concrete. That's devastating.

For now, expect the worst, prepare for the worst, get ready to fight.

Bare-knuckle if need be.

That is unless we are only predicating our current responses on the Exit Polls of the Opinions of the Press.
10 posted on 10/26/2005 1:50:15 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

For some reason I think you will not be smiling.

Very few join FR just to report they will be smiling this weekend.

May be wrong about you, but my BS radar is going off like crazy. I'll check to see if it needs tuning.

Nope, working just fine.


11 posted on 10/26/2005 1:50:36 PM PDT by Chuck54 (Free Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Haldeman

WHY?


12 posted on 10/26/2005 1:52:15 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

He's dead Jim.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 1:58:05 PM PDT by colorcountry (Proud Parent of a Soldier, a UPS Driver, an Executive, a Construction Worker, and a Student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Poof! He's already gone...


14 posted on 10/26/2005 1:58:17 PM PDT by metesky (This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
The scandal is two years of investigation where no crime could have possibly been committed.
15 posted on 10/26/2005 1:59:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Burn the tapes. Hide the billing records.


16 posted on 10/26/2005 2:05:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

So many new names on FR lately, with so many 1998 account dates...hmmm.


17 posted on 10/26/2005 2:12:05 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
This entire line of news and the giddy celebrations on the left remind me of only one other episode during President Bush's Presidency. That time was the morning and afternoon of November 2, 2004.

Bush was re-elected and Iraq is well on it's way. The Middle East will never be the same.....if Kerry made it in it would be a different story....we would have surrenered and the UN corruption game would have had new legs.

Bush is in till 09. Everything else is gravy.

The left has simply been itching for Clinton payback since 2000. That's what's behind all their actions....nothing more nothing less.

Unfortunately for them they lost in 04. Try as they may, they can't get it back.

Indictments? Meaningless.

18 posted on 10/26/2005 2:18:08 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: speedy

It is also illegal to use the CIA for political means, but when has a Dim been dealt with properly for breaking the law? Berglar? Not.


19 posted on 10/26/2005 2:48:13 PM PDT by RightthinkinAmerican (Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Here's a reference to Valerie Plame from June 14, 2003.

Joe Wilson gave a speech and in his bio, it says "He is married to the former Valerie Plame and has four children."

I kid you not. Check it out. He is at the bottom of the page.

http://www.epic-usa.org/Default.aspx?tabid=68


20 posted on 10/26/2005 4:09:12 PM PDT by UglyinLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson