Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/26/2005 10:32:13 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing

This is an excellent summary.


2 posted on 10/26/2005 10:35:43 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

I thought everyone knew this and the fact that Wilson lied about what so many people knew only points to the fact that Wilson isn't half as smart as he thinks he is.


3 posted on 10/26/2005 10:36:06 AM PDT by Peach (I believe Congressman Weldon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

Ping...


6 posted on 10/26/2005 10:54:00 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Quilla
American Thinker *ping*
7 posted on 10/26/2005 10:57:00 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

mark for later


10 posted on 10/26/2005 11:30:24 AM PDT by brothers4thID (Do you stand with us, or are you going to just stand in the way?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

ping


11 posted on 10/26/2005 11:48:32 AM PDT by lp boonie (Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing
And from :

Where and when?

****************************


Where and when?

​ ​​​​Joseph A. Wilson consistently told reporters heÂ’d seen the forged documents from Niger and noted that the names and dates on them were wrong and therefore he knew they were inauthentic. He testified in the same vein to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). When the Committee noted that we had not received those documents until eight months after his Mission, Wilson changed his testimony. As the members who filed an Additional Views Report observed, that statement made under oath was also at odds with the facts. From the Additional Views report of the SSCI:

The former ambassador told Committee staff that he, in fact, did not have access to any of the names and dates in the CIAÂ’s reports and said he may have become confused about his own recollection after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in March 2003 that the names and dates on the documents were not correct. Of note, the names and dates in the documents that the IAEA found to be incorrect were not names or dates included in the CIA reports.

It would thus appear that he did have access to the names and dates in the CIA reports, which means either (a) he had unauthorized access to classified CIA documents, received 8 months after his Mission or (b) he saw them before the CIA did.

Peter Fitzgerald, call your office.

Clarice Feldman   10 26 05p>






» Print this page


14 posted on 10/26/2005 12:16:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

"as another battle in the ongoing internal war between US intelligence agencies and the Bush administration."

My question is; Why after 5 years is there still an on going war?


22 posted on 10/26/2005 1:00:52 PM PDT by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

Chirac's revenge.


32 posted on 10/26/2005 5:00:24 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

Great post. I'm going to send it to Mark Levin.


36 posted on 10/26/2005 6:23:49 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

"Backing for British intell report on Congo" came from D.I.A.? The same agency thats trying to bury Able/Danger?


37 posted on 10/26/2005 6:42:59 PM PDT by Old Flat Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; Dog

here it is again:

"It is clear that a greater geo-political game has been afoot for some time. The fact that France had paid to have the Niger documents forged to embarrass the Bush administration is only part of the deception. The other aspect of this operation is that the CIA and ISG deliberately ignored or downplayed information provided by British intelligence and documents found in Iraq indicating that an Iraq-Africa uranium connection was a logical and reasonable conclusion, and that connection most likely involved the Congo."


40 posted on 10/26/2005 9:08:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson