Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
2 posted on
10/25/2005 3:08:06 PM PDT by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
3 posted on
10/25/2005 3:08:18 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
So, are Wilson and his wife now on the run, having received their letters from the prosecutor?
4 posted on
10/25/2005 3:08:40 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
One to five?
That's a pretty safe guess. Zero to ten is even safer. So that's what I think.
More....of nothing. We will know when we know.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
9 posted on
10/25/2005 3:11:21 PM PDT by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
12 posted on
10/25/2005 3:12:40 PM PDT by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Moonbat websites have been posting all kinds of nutty rumors for days/weeks. But here is a fact, tinfoil companies are making a killing.
13 posted on
10/25/2005 3:12:47 PM PDT by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
This has toast, Bush is legs.:)
14 posted on
10/25/2005 3:13:37 PM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(I'd never question a DUmmie's patriotism. Even after 14 years, they're still loyal to the USSR.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
The Special Prosecuter should be indicted for carrying on a prolonged investigation, costing taxpayers millions, into a case that has no crime as its basis.
15 posted on
10/25/2005 3:13:47 PM PDT by
TigersEye
("Gun don't kill people. Husbands that come home early kill people." - Larry the Cable Guy)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
This is both hugh and series.
18 posted on
10/25/2005 3:15:23 PM PDT by
scory
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
The 'indictment' rumor has been around since day one. It's their 'hope'.
Does anyone know if with a 'sealed' indictment the names of those being indicted are made public?
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
>The shoe is dropping
Lyndon LaRouche sez
Cheney and Rumsfeld are gone,
that their aides have flipped
and given info
against their bosses. Sometimes
LaRouche gets info
about DC right.
LaRouche further speculates
McCain wants a role
in Bush's White House . . .
I've no idea what's true,
but sounds like strange times!
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Anyone have any DU screen name and password that I can borrow. That place is in need of a fight.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
I think that they should empanel a grand jury to determine whether there was anyone at the time in DC who didn't know that Valerie Plame was with the CIA. It appears that the information could have been obtained from a walk down her street and a few offhand conversations with neighbors.
To: Dog; Howlin; onyx
39 posted on
10/25/2005 3:24:47 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: frankjr; Perdogg
OK folks - its prediction time. show us your cards.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
My "uber-insider" tells me this:
1. 0-100 indictments
2. Indictments to come any minute or not at all
3. Fitzgerald knows more than you do
4. Wilson is a doody head
48 posted on
10/25/2005 3:27:30 PM PDT by
Rokurota
(.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
A lib blog is reporting the following script to be aired on
CompleteBS news in a few minutes:
From the CBS Evening News, to air at 6:30PM:
CBS JOHN ROBERTS: Lawyers familiar with the case think Wednesday is when special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald will make known his decision, and that there will be indictments. Supporters say Rove and the vice presidents chief of staff, Scooter Libby, are in legal jeopardy. But they insisted today the two are secondary players, that it was an unidentified Mr. X who actually gave the name of CIA agent V alerie Plame to reporters. Fitzgerald knows who Mr. X is, they say, and if he isnt indicted, theres no way Rove or Libby should be. But charges may not focus on the leak at all. Obstruction of justice or perjury are real possibilities. Did Rove or Libby change statements made under oath? Did they deliberately leave critical facts out of their testimony or did they honestly forget? Some Republicans urged Rove to step down if indicted. Not a happy prospect for president Bush.
Any guesses on the identity of Mr. X?
SCHIEFFER: John, I am very interested in Mr. X. Is there any clue or hint as to whether he be - maybe someone who outranks Libby and Rove or would he be a lower-ranking official?
ROBERTS: The best guess is that Mr. X, even though his name is not known and some people are just speculating on who he might be or she might be, is somebody who is actually outside the White House, and in that case would be of a lower rank that both Rove and Libby.
49 posted on
10/25/2005 3:27:46 PM PDT by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Strange that an investigation about leaks seems to do nothing but leak.
69 posted on
10/25/2005 3:32:48 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
This just in:
Someone may get indicted. It may be tomorrow.
More later.
73 posted on
10/25/2005 3:33:47 PM PDT by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson