Now you are making me responsible for knowing about a conversation you are having with someone else?
I wouldn't dream of it, until you accused me of "bait and switch". If you didn't want me to hold you accountable for the posts, you shouldn't have challenged me on what I did or didn't say.
Not to mention the snarky DU comment - if you're going to insult the integrity of posters, please make sure you know what you're talking about first.
I suggest you quit interpreting and just read what it plainly says.
I am.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Yes and one of the rights retained by the people is to vote for representatives who will pass laws that are wanted by the people. Judges are overstepping their authority by striking down those laws. Laws that are completely acceptable under the constitution. Laws that regulate behaviour. like homosexual behaviour. If that is what the people want. Clearly that is what the people wanted however since the liberals could not sway the public they turned to judges. Unelected Judges that do not represent the people.