[Fenris6]

/via Powerline

"Who has been the better journalist - Judith Miller or those attacking her in her own paper's pages? Ms. Miller was sounding the alarm about the Iraqi threat and working her sources and fighting not to get beat. Ms. Dowd was parroting unsubstantiated smears, and Mr. Wilson was falsely downplaying Iraq's effort to obtain weapons of mass destruction, without disclosing to Times readers his wife's institutional interests."

http://www.nysun.com/article/21916

[frankjr]

Thanks for the Sun link. It shows that at the NYTimes, the loonies are in charge of that asylum.

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

Today's Dem Talking Points:

I just listened to a bit of Jerry Sproinger. He says that Rove and Libby were involved in forging those "fake" WMD documents. He says that that is why the White House is so terrified by this investigation. He's going bonkers over it!

[sam_paine]

Bejeezus! Is this a defenestration or an autophagy?

[syriacus]

Thanks for posting the link to the Sun article, Fenris6

It mentions Chalabi's current importance in Iraq

[Dolphy]

Thanks for the link to the editorial...it's really well done.

I continue to wonder...what is it that has put the New York Times in attack mode. I understand that they think they had it wrong on the WMD, largely because of Miller, but is the proper response to personally attack their own journalist? It just seems like something more is going on here...in so many words Miller has been declared a hostile witness.