1 posted on
10/20/2005 6:18:18 AM PDT by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
Steyn ping!
2 posted on
10/20/2005 6:21:28 AM PDT by
Pokey78
(‘FREE [INSERT YOUR FETID TOTALITARIAN BASKET-CASE HERE]’)
To: Pokey78
Ahhh...
Cofee + Steyn = Great morning.
3 posted on
10/20/2005 6:22:56 AM PDT by
SquirrelKing
(I'm not mean, you're just a sissy.)
To: Pokey78
We are witnessing a remarkable event: the death of a great nation not through war or devastation but through its inability to rouse itself from its own suicidal tendencies. The ideological vacuum was mostly filled with a nihilist fatalism. Churchill got it wrong: Russia is a vacuum wrapped in a nullity inside an abyss Russia is mearly leading the charge off the cliff. The EU, and then the rest of the West, will be following along shortly.
4 posted on
10/20/2005 6:27:33 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Pokey78
Wow--this is high-octane stuff. Love it!
5 posted on
10/20/2005 6:27:37 AM PDT by
Shalom Israel
(How's that answer? Can I be a nominee to SCOTUS? I can give better answers than Ms. Miers...)
To: Tolik
6 posted on
10/20/2005 6:30:09 AM PDT by
King Prout
(like flies to wanton boys are trolls to the Mods - they ZOT 'em for their sport.)
To: Pokey78
There used to be a significant number of FReepers who were aggressive Russian nationalists. They would always make claims about how Russia was growing again, getting stronger and more populous, etc.
It's pathetic that a country with such vast natural wealth and such an enormous reserve of brainpower is a complete and total basketcase.
From the Treaty of Vienna until today Russia has had every opportunity imaginable to become a fabulously wealthy, vibrantly successful nation.
It has squandered each and every opportunity.
8 posted on
10/20/2005 6:35:45 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: Pokey78
A Latvian friend of mine that served in the Soviet Army once told me that all the peoples the Russians had sucked into their empire hated them and were waiting for a chance at payback.
10 posted on
10/20/2005 6:37:57 AM PDT by
claudiustg
(Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
To: Pokey78; nuconvert; struwwelpeter; Tailgunner Joe
Are you sure about the mother-thing?
http://www.nwo.nl/nwohome.nsf/pages/NWOP_6GMGX5_Eng
Russia as a bride
7 October 2005
Not mother Russia but 'bride Russia' is a central theme in the work of many twentieth-century Russian writers and thinkers. The political developments that occurred in twentieth-century Russia, gave rise to a tendency to view the home country as an inaccessible bride held captive by the Russian state. This is what Dutch researcher Ellen Rutten contends in her Ph.D. thesis.
From the last Romanov tsar to Putin - all Russian leaders since 1900 have at some time or other been portrayed in the literature as an angry husband who tyrannises poor female Russia. In the majority of cases these images mainly revolve around the role of the Russian intellectual elite, the intelligentsia, who consider themselves to be the bridegroom of that same female Russia. That is what Rutten discovered during her research into the image of Russia in literary, philosophical, publicist and esoteric texts.
Various early twentieth-century writers and thinkers compared the elite's role with respect to Russia and the Russian people to that of a lover who fails to develop a relationship with his female beloved. This was the outcome of an identity crisis that arose in the nineteenth century and which became increasingly more serious during the course of the twentieth century. Rutten reveals how this gender metaphor continued to persist throughout the twentieth century.
Putin as a tyrannical husband
Meanwhile the image of Russia as a bride is a favourite subject for ridicule and parody in modern Russian novels and poems, but also, for example, in recent films and song lyrics. The role of the tyrannical husband is assigned to Russian rulers from Lenin to Putin; and that of the failing lover to the artistic elite from before the revolution or the dissidents of the 1970s.
Rutten's research demonstrates that the sexual dimension of the metaphor in question has become increasingly important during the course of the twentieth century. Popular modern writers introduce Russia as a young woman of flesh and blood. For them confrontations with the state or the intellectual elite are a purely sensual encounter, in which everything revolves around whether or not an orgasm is achieved. Whereas in the case of an early twentieth-century poet, such as Aleksandr Blok, Russia was still mainly portrayed as a silent, exalted female form, Vladimir Sorokin characterises Russia as a heroine whose physical attractiveness and sexual exploits take centre stage.
Ellen Rutten's research was funded by NWO.
14 posted on
10/20/2005 6:50:47 AM PDT by
AdmSmith
To: Pokey78
Thanks, a Steyn top ten. One of his best, ever.
16 posted on
10/20/2005 6:54:34 AM PDT by
NCSteve
To: Pokey78
I looked the man in the eye and found him very straightforward and trustworthy, George W. Bush said after two hours with Vladimir Putin. I was able to get a sense of his soul.
When I first heard this, I nearly fell out of my chair.
Bush should have followed it up with his famous Trust me.
Gads.
To: Pokey78
It will become a nation of babushkas, unable to muster enough young soldiers to secure its borders, enough young businessmen to secure its economy or enough young families to secure its future.This, dear FRiends, is what China is building up it's army to defeat--lots of land and resources for the masses--no navy needed to transport the troops to, just march across the tundra.
18 posted on
10/20/2005 7:00:59 AM PDT by
twntaipan
(Tagline space for sale or rent.)
To: Pokey78
21 posted on
10/20/2005 7:04:35 AM PDT by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Pokey78
23 posted on
10/20/2005 7:06:19 AM PDT by
Gritty
("Today’s Russia is a crisis wrapped in a disaster inside a catastrophe - Mark Steyn)
To: Pokey78
To: TR Jeffersonian
29 posted on
10/20/2005 7:13:11 AM PDT by
kalee
To: Pokey78
"Thats the danger for America that most of what Russia has to trade is likely to be damaging to US interests. In its death throes, it could bequeath the world several new Muslim nations, a nuclear Middle East and a stronger China."
Thanks for the ping, Pokey...that got my day off to a lovely start...NOT! ;)
Cripes. One MORE thing to keep me up nights thinking about, LOL!
31 posted on
10/20/2005 7:15:23 AM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Pokey78
Even the otherwise perplexing enthusiasm of the western Left for the jihads misogynist homophobe theocrats is best understood as a latterday variation on the Hitler/Stalin pact.
32 posted on
10/20/2005 7:15:51 AM PDT by
aculeus
To: Pokey78
Thanks for the ping.
This is a disturbing article.
To: Pokey78
I don't know if he's right about all of it, but it is a safe bet that he's right about a lot of it. Kinda scary, that.
41 posted on
10/20/2005 8:15:08 AM PDT by
Ramius
(Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 900 knives and counting!)
To: Pokey78
"Plus ça change, eh? Last week Islamists killed a big bunch of people in Nalchik, the capital of the hitherto more-or-less safe-ish Russian republic of Kabardino-Balkaria. "
*****
I'm still amazed how LITTLE coverage this got. Many thanks for the pokey-ping!
43 posted on
10/20/2005 8:21:05 AM PDT by
timsbella
(Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson