Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
Actually, the Tali-ban did sign the Geneva conventions when they were in charge of Afghanistan.

So, the question is does the Geneva conventions protect soldiers of a war that resulted in the replacement of a government and now the new national government exists? Is the Tali-ban still protected under the Geneva convention?

Al-Queda fighters are Illegal combatants, I am not sure of the status for the Tali-ban.
104 posted on 10/19/2005 10:47:46 AM PDT by PureTrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: PureTrouble

Any combatant that is not in a recognizable uniform is a illegal combatant.


105 posted on 10/19/2005 10:51:43 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: PureTrouble
So, the question is does the Geneva conventions protect soldiers of a war that resulted in the replacement of a government and now the new national government exists?
It would seem that it would have to since virtually all wars have this as their objective.

Cordially,
GE
107 posted on 10/19/2005 10:57:09 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson