I wasn't really directing my statements toward priests, per se. But, having worked for too many years (at Johns Hopkins Hosp. in a clinic, diagnosing and treating with medroxyprogesterone acetate,) with pedophiles, most (90+%) were males and most (90+%) preferred male children under 10 yrs old. I'm not confident in the data about priests preferring near or post pubescent males. We saw a good number of priests and all lamented the fact those who were readily available were altar boys---"too old," they said. But, hey, beggars can't be choosey.
I don't mean to be flippant, but that was their attitude.
What kind of pedophiles were you treating at Johns Hopkins?
Was there a reason that the pedophiles being treated at Johns Hopkins did not reflect the statistics commonly found vis a vis girl/boy victims?
And what did the drug you mentioned do to them or for them?