I dont agree. There is little difference. Marriage involves love, not a business deal.You dont truly believe Jackie married Onasis for love. When money enters into the deal it is little more than prostitution. When Jackie died she was living with a married man. She is no more high class than any other prostitute. When JFK had his girlfriends coming in the back door Jackie had her boyfriends coming in right behind them. A prostitute is nothing more than a whore who makes money at it instead of giving it away for free.
Equating the "bad" marriages of two women, whom you deem mercenary or unfit, still doesn't make your case comparing prostitution (ONE hooker screwing THOUSANDS of men a year) to marriage (one man, one woman).
Citing adultery for your description only cites a bad marriage, not the case for equating prostitution with marriage.
Prostitutes are promiscuous by choice of occupation. There is no love, no sacrifice, no commitment. No intention of any of those is in the exchange of services.
You judge these women by what you read in the newspapers.
In the past marriages were often deals between families....and they weren't equated in any way, shape or form, with prostitution, no matter how cynical or bitter one might have been. Sometimes the frontier men and women got married with brokers.
Equating marriage with prostution shows how little you think of marriage. Bad marriages are NO justification or excuse for prositution. Nor do they nullify the beauty of the institution. There is NO way in the world to describe prostitution in any other terms but a pathetic, dysfunction woman (usually a drug addict or drunk) putting her face in THOUSANDS of men's crotches for cash, and/or lying on her back, naked, and spreading her legs for THOUSANDS of total strangers, for cash.
Faulty logic. Comparing one bad behavior (promiscuity of prostution) with another bad behavior (adultery)doesn't make the case.