Skip to comments.
Constitution Party of Texas
email
| 10 14 2005
| Bryan Malatesta
Posted on 10/14/2005 4:27:29 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
They may gain a few local seats now but more later!
Right now most members of Congrees are socialist or socialist lite!
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
maybe on the state level, but nationally this country has a 2 party mindset and unless something really drastic happens, I don't think that is going to change too soon....
2
posted on
10/14/2005 4:29:10 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Funny how many of us are around.
Howdy, fellow Constitutionalist.
3
posted on
10/14/2005 4:33:08 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
They'd do better to meld with the Texas GOP and pull the GOP to the right.
4
posted on
10/14/2005 4:34:23 PM PDT
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: MikeinIraq
Don’t forget that I want to send you a FREE copy of Joe Trippi's book, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"
Read this free book!
5
posted on
10/14/2005 4:37:02 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
To: Leapfrog
I'm getting a lot of lobbying to join the Constitution party from within my own household.
6
posted on
10/14/2005 4:37:54 PM PDT
by
mhx
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
that's quite alright...I don't need to read anything like that...
For the same reasons I won't read any of Rush's books or anything else.
Political books bore the crap out of me. Always have, always will.
7
posted on
10/14/2005 4:38:36 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
To: Leapfrog
Democrat is socialistic.
Republican is socialist lite.
Libertarian is anarchy.
8
posted on
10/14/2005 4:40:24 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
To: mhx
Only vote CP if you think the candidate can win. That means local office and such right now. State level may be a few years off.
Let's not blow the Hillary thing in '08.
9
posted on
10/14/2005 4:43:32 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Democrat is socialistic. Republican is socialist lite. Libertarian is anarchy. Constitution Party is futile.
To: Killborn
Not possible. To many bribes and buy outs from special interests in both main parties.
Has the GOP listened to its core the last 10 years?
How many former democrats are now members of the GOP?
11
posted on
10/14/2005 4:45:04 PM PDT
by
crz
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I disagree somewhat.
- Democrat - Socialist
- Republican - Neocon
- Libertarian - Bastard offspring of the above two listed
12
posted on
10/14/2005 4:48:46 PM PDT
by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: crz
Dixie will rise again!
Seriously, if Bush and the Republicans don't start governing by the principles they ran on, it will be either the Constitution Party or the Southern Independence Party for me!
13
posted on
10/14/2005 4:54:14 PM PDT
by
trek
To: Leapfrog
yeah that is about right...
there is no such thing as a moderate...
14
posted on
10/14/2005 4:56:06 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
To: Leapfrog
Right now I would only vote CP if a) I preferred the candidate and the candidate could win, or b) I preferred the CP candidate, and the Republican is someone who is conservative enough that I would be ok with them as a second choice, and they are already guaranteed to win by a large margin (which never happens in California!)
15
posted on
10/14/2005 5:01:02 PM PDT
by
mhx
To: mhx
Oh, and c) there aren't any other conservatives running, and aren't any Republicans that even come close to being acceptable. Then there's no point in voting for the Republican as a second choice if they're really an unacceptable choice.
16
posted on
10/14/2005 5:02:41 PM PDT
by
mhx
To: crz
They used to say going to the moon isn't possible. :)
17
posted on
10/14/2005 5:07:02 PM PDT
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: mhx
18
posted on
10/14/2005 5:25:24 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
To: Killborn; HuntsvilleTxVeteran
They'd do better to meld with the Texas GOP and pull the GOP to the right.
No offense, but where do you think most of these people come from? I have been attempting just what you suggest for 2 decades. To what ends? How much of a "right" turn has the Republican Party made? No, both National Party's have set themselves up to feed from the trough, and make it quite clear, vote for us, doesn't matter which one of us, then sit down and STFU! Thanks, but I've had my fill! Blackbird.
19
posted on
10/14/2005 6:47:45 PM PDT
by
BlackbirdSST
("Read my Lips, no new Taxes" G.W Bush "Trust me!" G.H.W Bush...do I have that right?)
To: Killborn
I once believed as you do though, hence the no offense intended preface to my post. Blackbird.
20
posted on
10/14/2005 6:48:44 PM PDT
by
BlackbirdSST
("Read my Lips, no new Taxes" G.W Bush "Trust me!" G.H.W Bush...do I have that right?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson