[onyx]

You couldn't be more wrong about Howlin if you tried.

She one of FR's best researchers and was an integral part of exposing Dan Rather, along with Buckhead.

[rcrngroup]

So explain the research and logic in Howlin's post #295? As if that made any sense at all or had anything to do with the previous postings?

Satisifed that you have no command of the English language, yes.

[beckett]

She one of FR's best researchers and was an integral part of exposing Dan Rather, along with Buckhead.

How(Michael Brown is not a lawyer)lin had nothing to do with researching Dan Rather's fraud, as one can easily see by examining the thread where Buckhead made his brilliant analysis. She was simply Buckhead's interlocutor.

And, just as she's done on this thread, she certainly does engage in personal insults with whoever disagrees with her, and has developed a well deserved and undesirable reputation in that regard.