Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flevit

The problem is an honest debate is very quick

Scientist: What evidence is there fir intelligent design

ID: Faith

Scientist: That doesn't meet the qualifications for science.

ID: Well what is the evidence for evolution

Scientist: ...gives long rambling answer

ID: There are problems with that argument

Scientist: Then improve the science, don't give up and introduce religion into science

ID: You are trying to exclude the truth


2 posted on 10/07/2005 10:12:49 AM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Good summary. The only probelm is that the majority of Americans will fall asleep when the scientists get technical. That's how ID can sneak in. It's easier to put in a sound bite. Actually, all it is is a sound bite.


4 posted on 10/07/2005 11:07:08 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
An excellent summary of the argument, but still too long.

Evolution doesn't support the Bible. I'm afraid to meet my maker with a stain from wriggling evolutionists where they slipped through my proselytizing fingers.

5 posted on 10/07/2005 11:15:38 AM PDT by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson